{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigv4ootkbqq663yinwjwtyzq5oa7zm2m5rm7ihpkq5djxsdcwwfta",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mk3p5tnlxvj2"
  },
  "path": "/t/veracrypt-concerns/37344#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-22T13:59:44.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "Well… Why VC still downloadable only from website? It feels like microslop experience, where you need to go to various websites to make something work and pray not to catch malware\n\nAlso VC even doesn’t have **official** PPA. So you cannot just `apt update && apt upgrade`.\n\nWith website downloads you need to _manually_ check sign/hash of downloaded file, when apt does this automatically.\n\nMoreover, what stops devs to host repo instead of file dumpster to at least do something like LibreWolf did? They already have downloadable files on their server, so adding custom repo shouldn’t be a pain…",
  "title": "VeraCrypt concerns"
}