Escaping an Anti-Human Future: A Conversation with Tristan Harris

The problem is that it seems like you want to blame a prior invention, because you argue like other inventions would necessary follow from that invention. That A is a dependency of B, doesn’t mean that B is a dependency of A. If you learn to write Java, this doesn’t mean that you have to write any program that can be written in Java. You could learn Java and only write certain Java programs. Nostromo: > go on to make thinking machines who can aid humanity in however small or large manner (which has yet to be seen fully and completely). I don’t think that AI is an aid to humanity under our current circumstances. Maybe it could be very useful under different circumstances.