{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigrp7zrpo3ah3xffppxes7y5vxf5x2vkjqzq25pcb2cwy3cev7jeu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjpc6lzao4p2"
  },
  "path": "/t/tuta-drive-first-look-the-encrypted-workspace-big-tech-wont-build/37183#post_18",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-17T14:10:20.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "Emails are almost completely disjoint from one another, whereas filesystem storage (“Drive”) is often structured. You could reasonably store emails in an object storage database like S3, whereas you require hurdles to usefully represent files and folders in such a format. This given, I really don’t think email suits itself to drive storage companion very much more than any other cloud-hosted data.\n\nJust about every single computer-based application requires some kind of account and associated storage of data. Email doesn’t feel very special in that regard.\n\nMore topically, I recall an interview with a Tuta representative on The Hated One’s YouTube channel where they stated that they weren’t interested in introducing drive storage, because they understood the importance of not having your eggs in a single basket—and just focusing on email.\n\nWell, lo’ and behold, they are introducing drive storage. I don’t see their new commitment to “only the essentials” as any more credible than their commitment to “just email” was.",
  "title": "Tuta Drive First Look: The Encrypted Workspace Big Tech Won't Build"
}