{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreic4jkuumqh36gs52tfwgb6rpil7ojau6fua5hak62pwbcyj7h4emi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjnmgri6pnx2"
  },
  "path": "/t/telegram-linked-to-an-abuse-economy-built-on-the-invasion-of-ordinary-womens-privacy/37122#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-16T22:41:32.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "fiqiluvo.epileto:\n\n> They do hash checks on known CSAM/other abusive media. It’s absurd to demand Telegram to spend millions on surveillance tech otherwise.\n\nThe simple fact that Telegram has a history of ignoring request suggests that they are not serious about stopping abuse. If abuse websites can also generate advertising revenue through Telegram’s premium subscriptions that also suggests a lax attitude. I am not remotely convinces that Telegram is doing their best. Especially when I know that they have a history of deception.",
  "title": "Telegram linked to an “abuse economy” built on the invasion of ordinary women's privacy"
}