Proton Meet Isn't What They Told You It Was

Gersand:

Irrelevant

I understand your point, but your argument is too simplistic for me. Also, are you aware of what you’ve written to me?

• How do you know that Claude’s new model hasn’t cracked a “modern” encryption algorithm? Do you have any specific, clear, high-quality, verifiable (at least accessible to me), official sources, at the very least?
• You claim that the infrastructure is irrelevant—on what basis and why? Proton is essentially giving away data to the United States for free if they can exploit it properly without having to go all the way to Switzerland, and if someone wanted to develop superior technology to break the encryption in real time, it could happen, as I said before.
• Just as I wrote to someone else in the AdGuard group on Telegram, I’ll say the same to you: It’s not enough to be audited. AI is being developed rapidly, and the danger is growing more and more; it depends on who uses it, for what purpose, and how it’s implemented.

-> My recommendation for you : Be proactive; think about emerging trends, including consistency across all the company’s products—not just one (at a minimum). If you stick with the “default” (binary) approach, you’ll be vulnerable because no one knows what might happen tomorrow. Try to learn how to identify potential real risks (re-read and try to correctly interpret my two previous messages to seize), etc.

The decision is yours.