{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigffvy25k4fqcohjuziuj3qiyjuqzwbjjy3qucv5njtvbmlgocfay",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj6whd6gqlk2"
  },
  "path": "/t/apple-expands-age-verification-to-singapore-south-korea/36864#post_5",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-11T03:37:26.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "연합뉴스 – 1 May 24",
    "'주민등록증 열 손가락 지문 채취'에 헌재 '합헌' 유지 | 연합뉴스"
  ],
  "textContent": "There is some backlash, mostly by younger generations, since some older generations in Korea don’t even have a concept of privacy, those people only care about crime, and whenever people talk about privacy their response is “What are you hiding”.\nCurrent state of privacy in Korea is somewhat based on a cultural foundation of it, Confucianism (Ruism), which emphasizes things like communal effort and order.\nWhile younger generations are less influenced by it, due to extremely low birth rate in South Korea, they are vastly out numbered in a political scene.\n\nSpeaking of national IDs, Korea does have mandatory ID called 주민등록증, and to create one, people have to scan ALL of their fingerprints on 10 fingers, since anyone can be criminal in the future! Those fingerprint data is then stored in Law enforcement database, forever.\nAs far as I know, Korea is one of the very few countries that does that.\n\nThere was an appeal to Constitutional Court of Korea that challenged this status quo, by some brave teenagers in 2020, claiming it is unconstitutional, but Constitutional Court of Korea rejected that appeal and claimed current status quo is in fact constitutional, which is depressing.\nHere is an relevant article in Korean if anyone is interested in.\n\n연합뉴스 – 1 May 24\n\n### '주민등록증 열 손가락 지문 채취'에 헌재 '합헌' 유지 | 연합뉴스\n\n(서울=연합뉴스) 이대희 기자 = 주민등록증을 발급할 때 열 손가락의 지문을 모두 채취하도록 한 현행 법령은 개인정보 자기 결정권을 침해하지 않...",
  "title": "Apple Expands Age Verification to Singapore & South Korea"
}