Wish for "clean" Brave Browser
Menkork:
Could you just tell us what modifications have been done to improve it?
github.com/imputnet/helium
Does Helium inherit the security issues from ungoogled chromium (mDNS, etc.) ?
opened 11:50PM - 12 Dec 25 UTC
closed 08:03PM - 05 Feb 26 UTC
Arjun127790
For your issue to not get closed without review, please confirm that: - [ x] Th…is issue does not fit into any of the predefined categories, which is why I am making a blank issue from scratch. - [ x] I am not reporting a security vulnerability through this issue, because I am aware that there is an appropriate channel for that. - [x] I understand that I will be permanently banned from interacting with this organization if I lied by checking any of these checkboxes. --- The ones spoken of from this site: https://qua3k.github.io/ungoogled/ ?
Menkork:
There’s also a supply chain weakness I’m seeing here
What is the problem with reporting a vulnerability if you already see it?
Menkork:
You’re still relying on a small team to merge upstream patches
So? You’re always relying on someone, and everything is built solely on trust, unless it’s Google Chrome, from a major company that’s also the developer of Chromium.
Menkork:
compile them on third party cloud servers
I’m sorry, what? What third-party cloud servers? What do you consider first-party?
Menkork:
Not to mention, they aren’t providing any sort of solution for MV2
What does that mean? Is MV2 supposed to be in the browser or not?
Discussion in the ATmosphere