{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih5spe35uzwxmowozzvmegyd5vspdjh2je7ho67vm22b7jcfopriu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:gxs6vp6pkwm2revsdeyh6g5v/app.bsky.feed.post/3mh6t7srpntk2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiajx2g5mct4aw354nlyjgjh3ai4zqczaws7vrzaceidsfyq3pqqn4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 796622
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/16/how-old-philosophers-are-when-their-influence-peaks/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-16T12:52:32.000Z",
  "site": "https://dailynous.com",
  "tags": [
    "Data",
    "data",
    "digital humanities",
    "history of philosophy",
    "How Old Philosophers Are When Their Influence Peaks?",
    "Daily Nous"
  ],
  "textContent": "Philosophers of the past 100 years or so have tended to reach “peak influence” between their early 50s and late 60s, according to a new analysis from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside). To determine this, Professor Schwitzgebel looked at how frequently the authors are mentioned in philosophy journal abstracts, titles, and keywords over time—that is, their “discussion arcs,” discussed previously here. He analyzed the discussion arcs of 25 anglophone philosophers born in the 20th century who are among the most-cited in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Here’s the youngest set of them, those born between 1941 and 1945: For the charts for the other sets of philosophers, see Schwitzgebel’s post, here. Below is the overview for all the philosophers he looked at: As I’m sure Professor Schwitzgebel would agree, “discussion arcs” are just one way to capture the influence of philosophers, and a partial one, at that. For one thing, the influence of philosophers sometimes extends beyond the discipline’s professional ecology. For another, it is unclear how far the discussion arc approach could be extended to apply to philosophers who lived during a time in which nothing like the professional ecology of the past 150 years or so existed. And lastly, with enough time, some philosophers become so influential that their ideas come to be detached from their names, and in some cases come to be more like the lenses through which we see, or the tools with which we work. When did Aristotle’s influence peak? Has it?\n\nThe post How Old Philosophers Are When Their Influence Peaks? first appeared on Daily Nous.",
  "title": "How Old Philosophers Are When Their Influence Peaks?"
}