{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig67vy5nj2vxszxxujcc5b7tvusztz6tjxhmjgeyjedoppatj34we",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ghttxidrc2tjwtxvjizwwrej/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpdo5rigqdy2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidrg2x6aanrjhzteuytqhqitpqq263gpvzgujrw6fkzsnqqrlnv3y"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 116100
  },
  "path": "/2026/06/27/supreme-court-mullin-v-al-otro-lado-decision-asylum-law/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-28T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://msmagazine.com",
  "tags": [
    "Global",
    "Immigration",
    "Justice & Law",
    "National",
    "Donald Trump and the Trump Administration",
    "Immigrant and Migrant Women",
    "Mexico",
    "Supreme Court",
    "Supreme Court ‘Mullin v. Al Otro Lado’ Decision Hinges Asylum Law on a Single Word",
    "Ms. Magazine"
  ],
  "textContent": "Just days after World Refugee Day, the Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a significant victory on immigration, allowing it to revive a policy that turns away asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border before they have an opportunity to present their claims.\n\nIn _Mullin v. Al Otro Lado_ , Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion rests on an isolated reading of the word \"in\"—an approach the dissenters say ignores decades of asylum law and the realities facing people fleeing persecution.\n\nThe post Supreme Court ‘Mullin v. Al Otro Lado’ Decision Hinges Asylum Law on a Single Word appeared first on Ms. Magazine.",
  "title": "Supreme Court ‘Mullin v. Al Otro Lado’ Decision Hinges Asylum Law on a Single Word"
}