{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiadqk5jmyggyzxmjlmd26ejmeqomxuixlgzqhae67oq6d2gbx25rm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:fsxdrar45fdrarzog6x2vyow/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgwziqaw2w22"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreih7rfaj4yz5gtz3qaj7ydk7seumn5o53yn7d22detxzlawhuibsru"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 98421
  },
  "description": "What Most UX Portfolios Get Wrong: Discover why focusing on high-fidelity screens instead of thinking clarity is the most common reason design portfolios fail. Learn the three essential questions every case study must answer",
  "path": "/what-most-ux-portfolios-get-wrong/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-13T13:29:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://ux.prithivkumar.com",
  "textContent": "In the current design market, a \"pretty\" portfolio is no longer a competitive advantage—it’s the bare minimum. As a Senior Product Designer, I review countless portfolios every month, and most fail for the exact same reason: **They focus on screens instead of thinking.**\n\n### **The Problem with the \"Dribbble\" Approach**\n\nMany designers treat their portfolios like a gallery. They show final, polished high-fidelity screens with vibrant colors and smooth shadows. But recruiters aren't hiring you to make things look good; they are hiring you to solve business problems. If you skip the \"why,\" you are essentially telling the hiring manager that you are a pixel-pusher, not a problem-solver.\n\n### **What Recruiters are Actually Looking For**\n\nA strong, interview-ready portfolio must answer three specific questions that go beyond aesthetics:\n\n  * **The Problem:** What specific friction existed for the user or the business?\n  * **The Reasoning:** Why did you choose this specific solution over three other alternatives?\n  * **The Impact:** What actually changed after your design was implemented?\n\n\n\n### **Show the Journey, Not Just the Destination**\n\nMost designers skip the \"decision story.\" They hide the messy wireframes, the failed user tests, and the pivot points. By showing the journey, you demonstrate **thinking clarity**. You show that you can navigate ambiguity and make logical decisions under pressure.\n\n**The Bottom Line:** Your portfolio shouldn't just show that you can use Figma. It should show that you can think. If you want to save months of trial and error, stop building a gallery and start building a narrative.",
  "title": "What Most UX Portfolios Get Wrong",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-13T13:29:53.416Z"
}