{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifxkl36u5g726c6wpmayxmwj6d5ctobuacdrthf7jynqgycnogew4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 107136
  },
  "description": "Wort Wort Wort",
  "path": "/2025-10-25-halo-campaign-evolved/",
  "publishedAt": "2025-10-25T11:00:06.000Z",
  "site": "at://did:plc:ex23caczr45rodrfcxrwps6h/site.standard.publication/self",
  "tags": [
    "gaming"
  ],
  "textContent": "I have mixed feelings about Halo: Campaign Evolved. The trailer looks and sounds excellent, the gameplay is both improved and familiar, and the nostalgia vibes are strong.\n\nAnd that's the problem: this is the third version of the Halo: Combat Evolved campaign (Halo: Combat Evolved (2000); *Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary *(2011); and now Halo: Campaign Evolved (2026)).\n\nI really hope *Halo: Campaign Evolved *is good. But it's trading entirely on nostalgia.\n\nThat leaves me with some obvious questions:\n\nHow does Halo: Campaign Evolved move the franchise forward (excluding the fact that it'll be on PlayStation)?\n\nCan a 26-year-old game hold its own against modern FPS games or is this going to be like the Goldeneye64 remake?\n\nSplit-screen local co-op, online co-op, and no multiplayer...there's more to announce, surely?",
  "title": "Halo: Campaign Evolved"
}