{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://jcrt.org/archives/04.1/markmanolopoulos/",
  "path": "/archives/04.1/markmanolopoulos/",
  "publishedAt": "2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "at://did:plc:e24okfpxr7ctcbmruijop5gp/site.standard.publication/jcrt",
  "tags": [
    "[]"
  ],
  "textContent": "Manolopolous - When Marion's Theology Seeks Certainty - JCRT 4.1 \n\nWhen Marion's Theology Seeks Certainty\n\nMark Manolopoulos  \nMonash University\n\n  \n\n> Far from being the inalterable fate of theology, or mystical theology, Marion contends, the ‘metaphysics of presence’ is actually a heresy. True theology is always a ‘theology of absence,’ not a metaphysics of presence. When the Arians claimed that God is knowable and revealed by the names God is given, they were condemned. Of course, Derrida would be just as much worried over this inclination to exclude or ‘condemn.’ Does not this condemnation of presence itself imply a desire for presence, for the self-presence of an authoritative and self-gathering _ekklesia_? Does it not imply a politics of presence, an onto-theo-politics, a policing operation from which theology does not sufficiently distance itself? In one of its voices, Derrida says, mystical theology tries to be a little too authoritative about the secret, to say that nothing or no one can oppose this because mystical theology speaks from the heart of the secret as from the heart of truth and of hyper-fulfillment (\"Sauf le nom\" 66-7). It is always the other voice, the one that Derrida calls that of \"hypercritique,\" where nothing is assured, neither philosophy nor theology, that interests Derrida more. See Jean-Luc Marion (_God Without Being_ 153) where Marion sides with the power of the bishop to enforce the law if a theologian breaks with the consensus. \"Apostles of the Impossible\" 218-219, note 9; cf. _Prayers and Tears_ 47 including note 41.\n\n  \n\nBibliography\n\n> Caputo, John D. _The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion Without Religion_. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.\n> \n> \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_. \"Apostles of the Impossible: On God and the Gift in Derrida and Marion.\" _God, the Gift, and Postmodernism_. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. pp. 185-222.\n> \n> Caputo, John D., and Michael J. Scanlon, eds. _God, the Gift, and Postmodernism_. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.\n> \n> Derrida, Jacques. \"Sauf le nom.\" Trans. John P. Leavey, Jr. _On the Name_. Ed. Thomas Dutoit. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. pp. 33-85.\n> \n> \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_. _Cinders_, trans. Ned Lukacher. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991.\n> \n> Derrida, Jacques, and Jean-Luc Marion. \"On the Gift.\" _God, the Gift, and Postmodernism_. Moderated by Richard Kearney. Ed. John D. Caputo and Michael J. Scanlon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. pp. 54-78.\n> \n> Gregory of Nyssa, _De Trinitate_, III, 16 \\[_Patrologia Graeca_ 39, 873\\]). Cited by Jean-Luc Marion in \"In the Name: How To Avoid Speaking of ‘Negative Theology.’\" No other editorial details given.\n> \n> Hart, Kevin. _The Trespass of the Sign: Deconstruction, Theology and Philosophy_. Includes \"Introduction to the 2000 Edition.\" 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000.\n> \n> Horner, Robyn. _Rethinking God as Gift: Marion, Derrida, and the Limits of Phenomenology_. New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.\n> \n> Marion, Jean-Luc. \"In the Name: How To Avoid Speaking of ‘Negative Theology.’\" Includes a Response by Jacques Derrida. _God, the Gift, and Postmodernism_. Ed. John D. Caputo and Michael J. Scanlon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. pp. 20-53.\n> \n> \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_. _God Without Being_. Trans. Thomas A. Carlson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.\n> \n> \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_. _The Idol and Distance: Five Studies_, trans. with an introduction by Thomas A. Carlson. New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.\n\n  \n\n> Mark Manolopoulos is a doctoral student at the Centre for Studies in Religion and Theology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. His research focuses on the possibility of an eco/theo/logical reading of the Derridean aporetics of the gift.\n\n  \n\n> \n\n  *\n\n ' 2002 Mark Manolopoulos. All rights reserved.  \nUpdated 07/28/21.   \nhttp://jcrt.org/archives/04.1/markmanolopoulos/\n\n---",
  "title": "When Marion’s Theology Seeks Certainty"
}