{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifcre75ntowa7ev4n2msoscj7akrxi6ohmvr7r35xud7b36opbtuu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:dw5teuut32bt4skh5dbctk5g/app.bsky.feed.post/3mntmnzhu2ya2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiaunbowb272gcdgom7fo27sb2j5c7emhrqe5ixw3qzpoe25hf6lk4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 107142
  },
  "path": "/2026/06/08/utilize-bomb-grade-plutonium-for-energy-really/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-08T22:28:03.000Z",
  "site": "https://cleantechnica.com",
  "tags": [
    "Clean Power",
    "Nuclear Energy",
    "Policy & Politics",
    "Solar Energy",
    "Wind Energy",
    "Batteries",
    "Donald Trump",
    "nuclear bomb",
    "nuclear energy",
    "Plutonium",
    "solar",
    "US DOE",
    "Wind",
    "Utilize Bomb-Grade Plutonium For Energy? Really?",
    "CleanTechnica"
  ],
  "textContent": "I am one of those people who hates the word “utilize.” The logic of the English language would seem to be that to utilize something is to alter it to give it utility that it didn’t originally have. One example is to punch holes in the bottom of a bucket ... [continued]\n\nThe post Utilize Bomb-Grade Plutonium For Energy? Really? appeared first on CleanTechnica.",
  "title": "Utilize Bomb-Grade Plutonium For Energy? Really?"
}