{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreif2pekz2jcoduyc6ntksvyp7qcgp5mz64p5iqld4d277ukjp6h6w4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:dw5teuut32bt4skh5dbctk5g/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlrh3lt4kce2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiejrpbaoz7r4irzgfn3ecpi55pfd5bbiw5wasmeqvvggfk4bmctx4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 374768
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/13/eavors-geretsried-pivot-raises-hard-questions-about-next-gen-closed-loop-geothermal/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-13T23:11:12.000Z",
  "site": "https://cleantechnica.com",
  "tags": [
    "Clean Power",
    "Climate Change",
    "Geothermal Energy",
    "Green Economy",
    "Investment",
    "Market Research",
    "Policy & Politics",
    "Policy Research",
    "Research",
    "Eavor",
    "Eavor’s Geretsried Pivot Raises Hard Questions About Next Gen Closed-Loop Geothermal",
    "CleanTechnica"
  ],
  "textContent": "The recent GeoExPro interview about Eavor’s next-generation geothermal Geretsried project lands less like an update and more like a stress test result. Eavor was one of the more serious next-generation geothermal companies I had assessed, but that was never the same thing as saying it had solved geothermal. It had ... [continued]\n\nThe post Eavor’s Geretsried Pivot Raises Hard Questions About Next Gen Closed-Loop Geothermal appeared first on CleanTechnica.",
  "title": "Eavor’s Geretsried Pivot Raises Hard Questions About Next Gen Closed-Loop Geothermal"
}