{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihlahijphc6xars6oidcr7dgezwxcifmizjou7r3aodcpcclg2cq4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:dw5teuut32bt4skh5dbctk5g/app.bsky.feed.post/3mibu6nkvpyp2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibkdrjlnorl5unlwcu5kbejeb3zgxplgjf4sau5scpdor3yms6u2e"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 371468
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/29/progressive-funders-need-to-reassess-the-breakthrough-institute/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-29T19:42:57.000Z",
  "site": "https://cleantechnica.com",
  "tags": [
    "Clean Power",
    "Climate Change",
    "Green Economy",
    "Policy & Politics",
    "Policy Research",
    "Research",
    "Breakthrough Institute",
    "The Breakthrough Institute",
    "Progressive Funders Need to Reassess the Breakthrough Institute",
    "CleanTechnica"
  ],
  "textContent": "There was a time when a progressive or center-left foundation could back the Breakthrough Institute and tell a coherent story about why. Breakthrough presented itself as a pro-technology, pro-modernization, pro-development corrective to parts of environmentalism that had become too focused on scarcity, guilt, and procedural obstruction. It was abrasive, but ... [continued]\n\nThe post Progressive Funders Need to Reassess the Breakthrough Institute appeared first on CleanTechnica.",
  "title": "Progressive Funders Need to Reassess the Breakthrough Institute"
}