The Owners: Ten Billionaires Who Bought American Policy
They call it democracy. They call it free speech. They call it political participation. It's none of those things. It's a transaction. And we're not the customers.
If this piece matters to you, send it to someone.
Share
What this investigation exposes:
- 100 billionaire families poured $2.6 billion into the 2024 election, one of every six dollars spent
- The top 10 donors gave over $1.2 billion, with 8 of 10 backing Republicans
- Elon Musk paid $278 million for five months of government access, then dismantled the agencies that regulate his companies
- Miriam Adelson paid $100 million and got a war
- Billionaire political spending is up 160-fold since Citizens United
- The return on investment? Potentially trillions in tax cuts, deregulation, and policy outcomes
The Transaction
Let's stop pretending this is complicated.
One hundred billionaire families spent $2.6 billion on the 2024 election. That's one of every six dollars spent on federal races. Two and a half times what billionaires spent in 2020. A 160-fold increase since the Supreme Court decided in Citizens United that money equals speech and corporations are people.
They didn't spend that money because they love democracy. They spent it because they calculated, correctly, that the return would be worth the investment.
Elon Musk gave $278 million. According to ProPublica's investigation of leaked IRS files, that's roughly what he paid in federal income taxes across five years from 2014-2018, and in 2018 he paid nothing at all. For that price, he got five months inside the federal government, access to databases across every agency, the power to fire thousands of workers, and the ability to dismantle oversight of his own companies.
The man who runs Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and X was given keys to the agencies that regulate cars, rockets, brain implants, and social media. Then he gutted them.
That's not political participation. That's a leveraged buyout of the regulatory state.
The truth doesn’t trend. It survives because a few still care enough to keep it alive. Keep The Kade Frequency transmitting.
The Owners
Here are the ten people who bought American policy in 2024. Not the politicians, they're employees. The owners.
1. Elon Musk: $278 Million
What he bought: The government itself.
Elon Musk is the richest person on Earth. Net worth north of $250 billion. He runs Tesla (electric vehicles), SpaceX (rockets and satellites), Neuralink (brain-computer interfaces), The Boring Company (tunnels), and X, formerly Twitter (social media and influence).
Every one of those companies depends on government contracts, government permits, or government forbearance. SpaceX has billions in NASA and Pentagon contracts. Tesla depends on EV subsidies and regulatory treatment. Neuralink needs FDA approval. X operates under communications law that could be reinterpreted at any moment.
So Musk made an investment. $278 million to Trump's campaign, the largest individual political donation in American history.
In return, he got something unprecedented: a position inside the government with undefined authority and no Senate confirmation. "Senior Advisor to the President" running something called the Department of Government Efficiency.
For five months, from January to May 2025, Musk and his handpicked team, recruited via Signal, the encrypted app that auto-deletes messages, occupied positions across federal agencies. They accessed personnel systems. They accessed procurement databases. They accessed information systems across the government. They facilitated mass layoffs and terminated contracts.
A federal judge found Musk was DOGE's "de facto leader" who likely needed Senate confirmation under the Appointments Clause. The court ruled the takeover of the U.S. Institute of Peace was unlawful.
None of that mattered. By the time the rulings came, Musk was gone. The damage was done.
His exit in May 2025 was described as "rocky", reportedly involving clashes with Cabinet members and legal setbacks. But here's what didn't happen: accountability.
Musk is now hiding from depositions. Texas constables have attempted to serve him 14 times at various properties. Can't find him. The Justice Department is arguing he should be shielded from testifying using precedent originally created to protect Vice President Dick Cheney.
The man who ran around Washington for five months "wreaking havoc and abusing government resources", CNN's words, cannot be located to answer questions under oath about what he did.
Meanwhile, his companies continue to operate with reduced oversight from agencies he helped gut.
The return on investment: Incalculable. Potentially trillions in avoided regulation, favorable contract treatment, and tax benefits from the policies he helped shape.
What we know: According to Boston University epidemiologist Brooke Nichols's Impact Counter, DOGE cuts to foreign aid programs have led to an estimated 793,900 deaths as of February 2026, mostly children. A Lancet study projected an additional 14 million deaths by 2030. When asked about these figures, Musk wrote on X that "Zero people have died!" He's since left the government and cannot be found to answer further questions.
2. Miriam Adelson: $100-132 Million
What she bought: A foreign policy.
Trump himself told the story. Speaking to the Israeli Knesset, he said Miriam Adelson had taken "more trips to the White House than anybody else." Then he added this:
"I actually asked her once, 'So Miriam: I know you love Israel. What do you love more, the United States or Israel?' She refused to answer. That might mean Israel."
The chamber laughed. But it wasn't a joke. It was a confession.
Miriam Adelson was born in Tel Aviv in 1945. She served as an officer in the Israeli military. She married casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson in 1991 and together they built a political machine that has donated over $600 million to Republican candidates and causes.
Sheldon died in 2021. Miriam continued. In 2024, she gave over $100 million to Trump's campaign, making her the third-largest donor. Her super PAC, Preserve America, was a major force in the election.
What did she want?
In 2016, the Adelsons pushed Trump to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He did it. They pushed him to recognize Israeli control over the occupied Golan Heights. He did that too. She received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2018.
During the 2024 campaign, Adelson sought Trump's support for Israel's annexation of the West Bank. Her spokesperson denied that donations were conditioned on this policy. But Trump knows what she wants. He said so publicly.
And then came the war.
On February 28, 2026, the U.S. and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran. The war Adelson's late husband had advocated for decades was finally happening. The war Benjamin Netanyahu, whom the Adelsons have funded since his 1996 campaign, had worked toward for forty years.
As of this writing, the death toll in Lebanon alone is 2,294. Two hundred seventy-four women. One hundred seventy-seven children. One hundred health workers and rescuers.
But Miriam Adelson got her war.
She also runs the Maccabee Task Force, which targets pro-Palestinian campus protesters. Tax documents reveal she is MTF's president, directly overseeing social media campaigns attacking universities and individual students. One of those students, Mahmoud Khalil, faced unprecedented deportation proceedings without criminal charges. MTF's Facebook page targeting him is partially managed by individuals in Israel.
Adelson owns Israel Hayom, the most widely circulated newspaper in Israel, which has served as a megaphone for Benjamin Netanyahu and right-wing Zionism for years.
The return on investment: Embassy move to Jerusalem. Golan Heights recognition. The Iran war. Ongoing influence over Middle East policy. Campus speech suppression. A direct line to the Oval Office.
What she said: After October 7, 2023, Adelson wrote in Israel Hayom that anyone who criticizes Israel's military response is "dead to us."
3. Timothy Mellon: $125+ Million
What he bought: Invisibility.
You've never heard of Timothy Mellon. That's by design.
His grandfather, Andrew Mellon, built the family banking house into an industrial empire during the Gilded Age. He served as Treasury Secretary under three presidents. The Mellon name is on museums, universities, foundations.
Timothy inherited billions. He also inherited a philosophy: stay out of sight.
In 2024, Mellon gave at least $125 million to Trump's super PAC, Make America Great Again, Inc. He also contributed $25 million to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s presidential campaign before Kennedy dropped out and endorsed Trump.
That makes him the largest individual political donor in America. And almost no one knows his name.
Mellon founded a railroad tie company and formed a regional railroad. He lives in Wyoming, far from media scrutiny. He doesn't give interviews. He doesn't appear at rallies. He doesn't tweet.
He just writes checks.
What does he want? Immigration enforcement. Border security. The wall. Mellon has described himself as believing strongly in restricting immigration. His donations go to candidates and causes that promise the hardest possible line.
The return on investment: Immigration policy shaped by his priorities. Complete anonymity despite being the largest donor in the country. The Gilded Age operating model: own everything, be seen nowhere.
4. Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein: $133 Million
What they bought: The culture war infrastructure.
The Uihleins run Uline, a shipping supply company based in Wisconsin. Cardboard boxes. Packaging tape. Warehouse supplies. Their business exploded during COVID-19 when e-commerce boomed and everyone needed boxes.
Their fortune went to politics.
In 2024, the Uihleins were among the top five political donors, contributing over $133 million to conservative causes. Much of it went to Trump's campaign. But the Uihleins also fund the architecture of the culture war.
They've given to groups that questioned the results of the 2020 election. They fund Moms for Liberty, which advocates against public school curricula mentioning LGBTQ+ issues or critical race theory and supports book bans. They support candidates who promise to roll back what they see as progressive cultural capture of American institutions.
The Uihleins don't just fund campaigns. They fund movements. The think tanks. The advocacy groups. The parent organizations that show up at school board meetings. The legal foundations that challenge policies in court.
This is how you change a country. Not just by electing politicians, but by funding the entire ecosystem that creates political pressure, shapes public discourse, and makes certain positions seem inevitable.
The return on investment: A cultural and political infrastructure that will produce returns for decades. Book bans in schools. Curriculum changes. Election denial normalized. The Overton window shifted.
5. Ken Griffin: $100 Million
What he bought: Financial deregulation.
Ken Griffin is the founder and CEO of Citadel, one of the largest hedge funds in the world. His net worth is estimated at $45 billion.
In 2024, he gave $100 million to Republican candidates and causes, putting him among the top five donors. Griffin calls himself a "Reagan Republican", fiscally conservative, pro-business, skeptical of regulation.
What does a hedge fund billionaire want from politics? The same thing hedge fund billionaires have always wanted: favorable tax treatment, light-touch regulation, and policies that protect the financial system that made them rich.
Griffin has given to establishment-oriented super PACs like the Senate Leadership Fund and its House counterpart. He's not funding insurgents. He's funding the machinery that keeps the system running the way it runs.
The carried interest loophole, which allows hedge fund managers to pay lower tax rates on their income than teachers pay on theirs, has survived every attempt to close it. Private equity and hedge fund lobbying has been spectacularly successful at protecting the tax advantages that make billionaires out of financial engineers.
The return on investment: Continued favorable tax treatment. Protection of carried interest. Financial regulation that doesn't threaten the hedge fund model. Access to lawmakers who understand that the money will keep flowing as long as the policies stay friendly.
6. Jeff Yass: $50+ Million
What he bought: TikTok.
Jeff Yass is the co-founder of Susquehanna International Group, a quantitative trading firm. His net worth is estimated at over $40 billion.
Yass has a problem. Susquehanna holds a significant stake in ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns TikTok. For years, American politicians have threatened to ban TikTok over national security concerns. A ban would cost Yass billions.
So Yass became a political donor.
In 2024, he gave over $50 million to Republican causes. He's been particularly focused on candidates and organizations that oppose a TikTok ban.
The math is simple. Spend tens of millions on politics. Protect an investment worth billions. The return on investment is obvious.
As of this writing, TikTok is still operating in the United States. Various ban proposals have stalled, been delayed, or been structured with loopholes. Yass's investment continues to pay dividends.
The return on investment: TikTok still exists. ByteDance stake preserved. Billions protected by millions spent.
7. Stephen Schwarzman: $25+ Million
What he bought: Private equity's tax advantages.
Stephen Schwarzman is the CEO of Blackstone, the world's largest private equity firm. His personal wealth is estimated at over $40 billion.
Schwarzman has been a major Republican donor for years. In 2024, he gave over $25 million to conservative causes and candidates.
Private equity operates on a simple model: buy companies with borrowed money, cut costs (often by firing workers), extract fees, and sell. The industry has been spectacularly profitable for its executives, who benefit from the carried interest loophole that taxes their income at lower capital gains rates rather than ordinary income rates.
Every time politicians propose closing this loophole, the private equity industry mobilizes. Schwarzman has compared such proposals to Hitler's invasion of Poland. (He later apologized.)
The loophole survives. Private equity continues to extract wealth while paying lower tax rates than the workers whose companies they restructure.
The return on investment: Carried interest protected. Private equity's favorable tax treatment preserved. Billions in continued tax advantages.
8. Peter Thiel: Built the Bench
What he bought: The next generation.
Peter Thiel didn't spend as much in 2024 as he did in 2022, when he poured $30 million into electing J.D. Vance to the Senate and backing Blake Masters in Arizona. But his investment paid off.
J.D. Vance is now Vice President of the United States.
Thiel's model is different from the transactional donors. He doesn't just fund campaigns. He funds people. He identifies young talent, invests in them early, helps build their careers, and places them in positions of power.
Vance worked for Thiel at Mithril Capital. Thiel invested in Vance's venture capital fund. When Vance ran for Senate, Thiel's money made him viable.
Now Thiel has an ally in the White House. Not just someone who owes him. Someone who shares his worldview, skeptical of democracy's excesses, interested in technology as a tool of power, willing to break institutions that he sees as captured by hostile forces.
Thiel also funds the architecture of tech-authoritarian thinking. His foundation supports contrarian academics and writers. He backed Palantir, which provides surveillance technology to governments worldwide. His investments consistently support technologies that increase the power of those who control them.
The return on investment: The Vice President. A network of proteges throughout government and technology. The intellectual infrastructure for a politics that sees democracy as a problem to be managed rather than a principle to be protected.
9. Charles Koch: $25+ Million (The Long Game)
What he bought: Fifty years of institutional capture.
Charles Koch, now 89, has been funding conservative politics longer than most voters have been alive. Along with his late brother David, he built a political network that spent decades reshaping American institutions.
The Koch network didn't just fund campaigns. It funded think tanks: the Cato Institute, Americans for Prosperity, the Mercatus Center. It funded academic positions at universities. It funded legal organizations like the Institute for Justice. It funded state-level politics, recognizing that state legislatures draw congressional districts and make policy that affects daily life.
The Kochs played the long game. They invested in ideas and institutions, not just candidates. They understood that elections are downstream from culture, and culture is downstream from the intellectual infrastructure that shapes how people think.
In 2024, Koch-aligned groups spent over $25 million on federal races. But that's just the visible portion. The network's influence extends far beyond campaign contributions to the entire ecosystem of conservative policy development.
Climate denial? Koch-funded groups led the charge. Deregulation? Koch-funded economists provided the intellectual justification. Opposition to labor unions? Koch-funded organizations have been weakening worker power for decades.
The return on investment: Fifty years of policy victories. Environmental regulations weakened. Labor unions diminished. Tax policy tilted toward the wealthy. An entire intellectual infrastructure that makes conservative positions seem like common sense rather than ideology.
10. Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz: $50+ Million (The Tech Takeover)
What they bought: The future.
Andreessen and Horowitz run a16z, one of the most influential venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. In 2024, they endorsed Trump and poured over $50 million into political causes, with a particular focus on cryptocurrency and AI deregulation.
The tech industry spent years cultivating a progressive image. Now the mask is off.
Andreessen and Horowitz want regulation kept away from their portfolio companies. They want crypto allowed to operate without the oversight that traditional financial institutions face. They want AI developed without constraints that might slow innovation or raise liability concerns.
They're not alone. The tech industry's political realignment is one of the biggest stories of 2024. Billionaires who built platforms that shaped public discourse are now openly funding politicians who will protect those platforms from accountability.
The return on investment: Crypto regulation weakened. AI oversight delayed. The technology industry's freedom to move fast and break things preserved, now with political protection.
The Math
Add it up.
These ten donors, plus the other ninety families in the top hundred, poured $2.6 billion into the 2024 election. One of every six dollars spent.
What did they get?
Musk got government access and regulatory relief potentially worth trillions.
Adelson got a war.
Mellon got immigration policy.
The Uihleins got culture war infrastructure.
Griffin got financial deregulation.
Yass got TikTok preserved.
Schwarzman got carried interest protected.
Thiel got the Vice President.
Koch got fifty years of institutional capture.
Andreessen and Horowitz got AI and crypto deregulation.
The return on investment is astronomical. Spend millions, get billions. Spend billions, get trillions.
This isn't corruption in the traditional sense. No one is stuffing cash in envelopes. Everything is legal. Citizens Unitedmade sure of that.
This is something worse. It's the system working exactly as designed, for the people who designed it.
The Rest of Us
Here's what you get.
You get to vote every two or four years for candidates selected by people who can afford to fund campaigns. You get to choose between options that have already been vetted by donor networks that ensure no one truly threatening to their interests makes it to the ballot.
You get to watch as policy is made by people who will leave government and join the companies they regulated. You get to see your tax dollars flow to contractors connected to the donors who funded the campaigns.
You get to hear that there's no money for healthcare, childcare, or climate action, while the carried interest loophole survives another year and billionaire tax rates remain lower than yours.
You get to be told that this is democracy.
It's not.
Democracy is one person, one vote. This is one dollar, one vote, and some people have billions of them.
The owners have made their investment. They're collecting their returns.
You're not a citizen in this system. You're a line item.
The Owners
They don't call themselves that. They call themselves philanthropists. Job creators. Concerned citizens exercising their rights.
But look at what they bought.
Musk bought government access. Adelson bought foreign policy. Mellon bought immigration policy. The Uihleins bought culture war infrastructure. Griffin bought financial deregulation. Yass bought TikTok's survival. Schwarzman bought private equity's tax advantages. Thiel bought the Vice President. Koch bought fifty years of institutional capture. Andreessen and Horowitz bought the future.
They made investments. They're collecting returns.
And you're paying the price.
Frequently Asked Questions
Isn't political spending protected by the First Amendment?
The Supreme Court in Citizens United ruled that spending money on elections is a form of speech and that corporations have free speech rights. The decision essentially said you can't limit how much wealthy individuals and corporations spend to influence elections. Whether that's good constitutional interpretation or a catastrophic error that legalized oligarchy is a matter of intense debate. What's not debatable: it fundamentally changed American politics by allowing unlimited money to flow into elections.
Don't Democrats have billionaire donors too?
Yes. George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, and others have given heavily to Democratic causes. But the scale tilts Republican. Of the $2.6 billion from the top 100 billionaire families in 2024, 70% went to Republican and conservative causes, 23% to Democrats. The question isn't whether both parties have rich donors. It's whether a system that allows unlimited donations from billionaires can produce policy that serves anyone else.
What about small donors? Don't they matter?
Small donors contributed billions in 2024, but they're increasingly outpaced by mega-donors. More importantly, small donors can't fund the infrastructure that shapes politics between elections: the think tanks, the advocacy groups, the legal foundations, the media outlets. A $25 donation helps a campaign. A $25 million donation builds an ecosystem.
Could this be fixed?
Constitutional amendments to overturn Citizens United have been proposed. Public financing of elections exists in some forms but is massively outspent by private money. Disclosure requirements could at least let voters know who's funding campaigns. But every serious reform threatens the people with the most power to stop it. They haven't stopped it by accident.
Is this really new? Haven't rich people always controlled politics?
Rich people have always had outsized influence. But the scale has changed. Billionaire political spending is up 160-fold since Citizens United. We're in new territory, a level of wealth concentration funding a level of political spending that has no precedent in American history. The Gilded Age barons would be impressed.
What can ordinary people do?
Vote, but don't pretend voting is enough. Organize, recognizing that collective action is the only counterweight to concentrated wealth. Support independent media that follows the money. Demand disclosure. Run for local office, where money matters less. And never stop naming what's happening: this is not democracy. This is oligarchy with democratic trappings.
Independent investigations. Imperial expansion exposed. Pattern documented. Get investigations delivered.
Related Investigations
- The Architect: How Netanyahu Built the Iran War Over Forty Years
- The Burn Book: What's Really in the Epstein Files
- The Shadow Empire: How BlackRock Controls Everything
- Blood and Oil: Who Profits from the Iran War
A. Kade
Discussion in the ATmosphere