{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieblt3qq4tvumtgxz4mvguynz25j6w2adrwfki7y5hdkmchkt667e",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:bynrlepsv2xa2jabiif6vzzc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnjqk432sm22"
  },
  "path": "/archive/a_try_at_less_restrictive_mechanics",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-05T08:41:22.753Z",
  "site": "https://blognomic.com",
  "tags": [
    "Proposal,"
  ],
  "textContent": "Replace the paragraph beginning with “Each Associate has a publicly tracked amount of Crypto” with the following:An Associate may transfer any of their Credits to any other Associate, or a System, or the Guild.\n\nAdd a new rule, named “No Kingmaking”, with the following text:In this dynasty, Associates are expected to avoid consciously Kingmaking other Associates. Kingmaking is defined as doing something that would likely increase another Associate’s chance of achieving victory to a significant extent while likely decreasing the chance of the Associate taking the action to achieve victory to a similar extent.\nIdle Associates are considered to be Associates for the purposes of this rule.\n\nIf an Associate feels that another Associate has gone against this expectation in some way during the current dynasty, then they are encouraged to vote against all Declarations of Victory from that Associate during this dynasty. If an Associate feels that a Declaration of Victory has come about as a result of one or more other Associates making a sincere attempt to Kingmake the Associate declaring victory, even if the Associate declaring victory did not encourage the Kingmaking, then they are encouraged to vote against it, unless they believe the Associate declaring victory would have achieved victory anyway if the Kingmaking did not happen. This overrules the encouragement to vote according to the perception of a victory in the rule “Victory and Ascension”.",
  "title": "A Try at Less Restrictive Mechanics",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-05T06:52:51.000Z"
}