{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibl7i5q7sdaydt3nmh6s2ymkwee4wnd3whq7djovq4i4jmssn2sfq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:bynrlepsv2xa2jabiif6vzzc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mk2c2eisrfh2"
  },
  "path": "/archive/appendix_no_using_conditions_from_the_distant_past",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-22T00:56:31.215Z",
  "site": "https://blognomic.com",
  "tags": [
    "Proposal,"
  ],
  "textContent": "Add a new list item to the end of the list in the subrule “Time” of the Appendix rule “Clarifications”:A thing is considered to “have been X for Y” (where X is a condition and Y is a length of time) only if X has been continuously true for it for the immediately past Y and is still true for it, unless the rule in question specifically clarifies that having been X for any past Y is acceptable. This is true regardless of whether the thing in question is BlogNomic, a variable, a person, or something else. Similar wordings (like “has been X for the past Y”) are interpreted analogously.",
  "title": "[Appendix] No using conditions from the distant past",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-21T22:47:00.000Z"
}