{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiaskawpxljvi5nsxi7en2rkyhmzcs6tcnbl7l7ykvdlfsvh7uk6wi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:b7afdzqsmwksxypciqnplglk/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp5hjaroiwi2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreihcl6jalazex7sr2xz2zhwqd7g4u4nkjb7crizotczfp3kkf3b5fy"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 76376
  },
  "path": "/2026/06/25/king-queen-will-not-move-back-buckingham-palace-despite-369m-facelift-28927136/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-25T21:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://metro.co.uk",
  "tags": [
    "News",
    "UK",
    "Buckingham Palace",
    "King Charles III",
    "Royal Family",
    "King Charles",
    "almost £370million",
    "work",
    "10-year renovation plan",
    "the historic home",
    "London",
    "News Updates",
    "Breaking News",
    "supports HTML5\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tvideo",
    "Queen Elizabeth",
    "Covid",
    "royals",
    "Prince of Wales",
    "Add Metro as a Preferred Source on Google\nAdd as preferred source"
  ],
  "textContent": "King Charles III won’t be moving back into Buckingham Palace (Picture: via REUTERS)\n\nKing Charles won’t move back to Buckingham Palace once the almost £370million worth of refurbishment work has been finished.\n\nThe 10-year renovation plan might be drawing to a close, but the King and Queen Camilla will not return to the historic home as their official residence.\n\nThe palace will remain ‘monarchy HQ’ but Charles has decided that Clarence House will be his official London home for the rest of his reign.\n\n‘His Majesty retains huge affection for Buckingham Palace and a deep respect for its role in royal and public life,’ said a palace spokesperson. ‘It will be a buzzing hive of royal activity in every other way’.\n\nThe decision has been taken partly to increase public access to the London landmark, which remains incredibly popular with visitors.\n\n##  Sign up for all of the latest stories\n\nStart your day informed with Metro's **News Updates** newsletter or get **Breaking News** alerts the moment it happens.\n\nNaturally, when the King is in residence, security must limit the number of visitors and areas they are allowed to view.\n\nBuckingham Palace’s refurb has taken 10 years and almost £370million (Picture: REUTERS)\n\nJames Chalmers, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said: ‘I can update you that after careful consideration, and to greatly increase opportunities for public access, the King and Queen have decided not to adopt Buckingham Palace as a personal residence and will instead continue to use Clarence House as their London home.\n\n‘Their Majesties will, however, have access to private rooms within the palace where they can retire during the course of a working day, and which could be utilised as potential residential accommodation in times ahead.’\n\nThe iconic London building has been undergoing a 10-year refurbishment project replacing boilers, electrical cables and pipes costing £369 million to reduce the fire and flood risk, which is due to be completed next March.\n\nThe tradition of using Buckingham Palace as the official royal seat was started by Queen Victoria in 1837.\n\nThe Palace will still be used for official royal business (Picture: Chris Jackson/Getty Images)\n\nAfter her marriage to Prince Albert, she transformed the grounds to accommodate their growing family, entertain guests, and work in an official capacity.\n\nMr Chalmers added: ‘This is both a change from the past and a recognition of the future. Let me be clear, however, that in all other ways Buckingham Palace will continue to be both the ceremonial and operational centre of royal life.\n\n‘It is and will remain Monarchy HQ, the crown jewel of our national buildings, with the sovereign’s standard flying proudly from the roof whenever His Majesty is in London, just as it has done since accession.’\n\nCharles has lived at Clarence House, the former home of the Queen Mother, since 2003 and will continue to host a range of events at the palace from garden parties to receptions and hold audiences with new ambassadors.\n\nIt was widely assumed that Charles and Camilla would move in as it was closely associated with his mother, the late Queen. Her apartment will be made available to the royals during the day, once the work is finished.\n\nTo view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tvideo\n\nUp Next\n\nPrevious Page\n\nNext Page\n\nA Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: ‘It will remain a working home but we are seeking to widen public access precisely to maximise the national benefit of a publicly funded building.’\n\nIt’s been six years since Queen Elizabeth II last stayed overnight at the palace, releasing a message to the nation a few days before the first Covid lockdown was announced.\n\nShe wrote: ‘At times such as these, I am reminded that our nation’s history has been forged by people and communities coming together to work as one, concentrating our combined efforts with a focus on the common goal.’\n\nThe note had been written at Windsor Castle, where the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh spent much of the lockdown, being looked after by a reduced number of staff dubbed HMS Bubble.\n\nThere has been speculation that Prince William, who has recently moved his family to Forest Lodge in Windsor, will not live at Buckingham Palace when he is King.\n\nCharles’ decision not to move into the palace has left some campaigners frustrated, given the expense of the refurbishments.\n\nThe decision will allow for more visitors to see more of the palace (Picture: Aaron Chown/PA Wire)\n\nGraham Smith, chief executive officer of Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, said: ‘Despite ongoing concerns about the huge cost of the royals, the grant will remain hugely inflated on its initial level of £31 million in 2012.\n\n‘If that had risen by inflation the grant would stand at £45 million, not £100 million. The government agreed to spent £369 million on refurbishing Buckingham Palace, and now Charles doesn’t want to use it.\n\n‘But he’ll keep it under lock and key for when he does. Clearly, the palace needs to be fully open to the public all year round.’\n\nBetween 2024 and 2025, over 683,000 visitors strolled through Buckingham Palace, despite reduced days and parts of the palace being shut.\n\nAn estimated 2.3million visitors are believed to have visited the royal estates and exhibitions, generating over £90million in ticket sales, a net profit of around £14million.\n\nIt’s thought William will also not take up residence in Buckingham Palace (Picture: Samir Hussein/WireImage)\n\nA string of royal accounts were published on Thursday, including the first-ever tax bill from a monarch, which was £12.9 million for 2024-25, putting him among the country’s top 100 taxpayers that financial year.\n\nThe year before this was £11.7 million, with more than £30 million in total paid in tax by Charles since becoming King in 2022.\n\nMeanwhile, the Prince of Wales released his tax details for the first time, paying £7.76 million in income and capital gains tax in 2024-25, and £8.34 million in 2023-24.\n\nThe Sovereign Grant, which funds Charles’s official duties and the work of his household, increased by £45.8 million to £132.1 million in 2025-26.\n\nThe grant has a core element covering the cost of things such as travel, property maintenance and payroll and this has almost doubled in three years, increasing from £51.8 million in 2024-25 to £99.9 million in 2027-28.\n\nComment now Comments \nAdd Metro as a Preferred Source on Google\nAdd as preferred source\n",
  "title": "King and Queen quit Buckingham Palace despite £369,000,000 facelift"
}