{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidualv57qm5j5nq2yg4qttsxequvp6b5cvfaoqp2m7jfqeyve6gum",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:b7afdzqsmwksxypciqnplglk/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkkfmmingi32"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiarrxesgcqkv2ym2lxihgt7lg5fz73ecbijelj2cjw2nqahlb5klm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 38355
  },
  "path": "/2026/04/28/starmer-facing-a-crucial-sleaze-vote-today-happen-28146528/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-28T10:03:23.000Z",
  "site": "https://metro.co.uk",
  "tags": [
    "News",
    "Politics",
    "House of Commons",
    "Labour Party",
    "Peter Mandelson",
    "Sir Keir Starmer",
    "Sir Keir Starmer’s",
    "MPs vote",
    "Kemi Badenoch",
    "Parliament",
    "Foreign Office",
    "Government",
    "here",
    "US",
    "BBC",
    "Boris Johnson",
    "Labour",
    "Tories",
    "check our news page",
    "Add Metro as a Preferred Source on Google\nAdd as preferred source"
  ],
  "textContent": "Sir Keir Starmer will be at the heart of a debate in the Commons today (Picture: AP)\n\nThere have been many days in Sir Keir Starmer’s troubled term as Prime Minister that could be described as ‘crucial’ and ‘make-or-break’ – today is one of them.\n\nThe climax will come this evening, when MPs vote on whether the PM should be subjected to an investigation by the Privileges Committee.\n\nHe is facing accusations from Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and others that he misled Parliament when speaking about his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to the US.\n\nThat argument is made up of two halves: one covering Starmer’s claim that ‘due process’ was followed, and another covering his insistence that ‘no pressure whatsoever’ was applied on the Foreign Office over the case.\n\nBadenoch has suggested the evidence against the PM is undeniable. Government ministers have called the move a political stunt ahead of the May 7 elections.\n\nThe reality, as is often the case, appears to be quite messy, and the outcome may hinge on the definition of vague terms.\n\n##  Want to understand more about how politics affects your life?\n\nMetro's senior politics reporter Craig Munro breaks down all the chaos into easy to follow insight, in **Metro** 's politics newsletter Alright, Gov? Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.\n\nHere’s what you can expect to happen today.\n\n## What is the opposition arguing?\n\nThere are two parts to the case against Sir Keir Starmer, and both are rather technical.\n\nThe first says Starmer misled the House of Commons when he claimed ‘due process’ was followed in the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US.\n\nBadenoch points to advice from then-Cabinet Secretary Simon Case before Mandelson was appointed, which said the announcement should only be made after vetting had taken place.\n\nInstead, the vetting took place after Starmer made the announcement. The Tory leader argues that means due process was not followed.\n\nLord Peter Mandelson taking his dog for a walk in London last week (Picture: James Manning/PA Wire)\n\nBut the PM has produced later advice from Chris Wormald, Case’s successor, in which he says he has reviewed evidence which leads him to conclude ‘appropriate processes were followed’.\n\nAt the very least, this suggests it’s not cut-and-dry whether announcements should or shouldn’t come after vetting – it appears to vary from case to case.\n\nThe second part revolves around a claim from Starmer at last week’s Prime Minister’s Questions, that there was ‘no pressure whatsoever’ applied to the Foreign Office to push the process through.\n\nOn the face of it, this looks much easier to refute: the former top Foreign Office civil servant Sir Olly Robbins told the Foreign Affairs Committee last week that he faced ‘constant pressure’ to complete the process.\n\nSir Olly Robbins at last week’s Foreign Affairs Committee hearing (Picture: AP)\n\nHowever, the government says the implication here is that pressure was applied to get Mandelson approval _regardless of his vetting results_ – which ministers say is categorically untrue.\n\nOn the BBC’s Today programme, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: ‘Is there pressure in government to make sure things are done in a timely way so we get the government’s business through? Yes, that’s absolutely what you’d expect.’\n\nGovernment figures will have been cheered up by the evidence of Sir Phillip Barton, Robbins’ predecessor in the top Foreign Office job, in front of the Foreign Affairs Committee this morning.\n\nHe said explicitly: ‘During my tenure, I was not aware of any pressure on the substance of the Mandelson DV [developed vetting] case.’\n\n## What will happen to Starmer if today’s vote passes?\n\nIt’ll mean big trouble for Starmer.\n\nThe Privileges Committee may or may not say he misled Parliament on one or both of those points – but either way, the investigation would ensure the Mandelson affair gets drawn out for a very long time.\n\nThis would be painful for the PM, who has already said the appointment was a mistake and apologised for it.\n\nBoris Johnson was the last PM to be investigated by the Privileges Committee (Picture: Henrik Montgomery/TT/Shutterstock)\n\nIt would, of course, be a disaster of far bigger proportions if he’s found to have misled Parliament. That would almost guarantee his resignation.\n\nPerhaps the irony would hurt almost as much: it was Starmer who pushed for the Privileges Committee investigation that ended Boris Johnson’s political career when it found he had misled Parliament.\n\n## Is today’s vote likely to pass?\n\nNo. Labour still has a huge majority in the House of Commons, and even if the party’s backbenchers aren’t too keen on Starmer, they’ll be reluctant to hand the Tories such a big win the week before the elections.\n\nTo make doubly sure, government figures have been ringing around Labour MPs to ensure they’ll stay loyal in the vote.\n\nHowever, you may look at the fact they need to do that at all as a troubling sign.\n\nThe anger at Starmer over the Mandelson appointment isn’t going away, and could yet boil over once the results from the May 7 elections emerge.\n\n******Get in touch with our news team by emailing us atwebnews@metro.co.uk.******\n\n**For more stories like this,** check our news page.\n\nComment now Comments \nAdd Metro as a Preferred Source on Google\nAdd as preferred source\n",
  "title": "Starmer is facing a crucial sleaze vote today – what could happen?"
}