{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreif5s54ud5vamrd2qv2px6v3ngthvoszptcv7lxsdil5arppuyjdrm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ao3t7cr3n5vz5lhwlje3oied/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjk2h4hhrly2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibpprdpki2ithdzeqfoig2leymrmhaz2zhlezdmwpjaaj54uwchfm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 149236
  },
  "path": "/story/should-smoke-alarms-be-smart/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-15T13:18:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.wired.com",
  "tags": [
    "Gear",
    "Gear / Buying Guides",
    "Gear / Products / Home",
    "Gear / Products / Smart Home",
    "smart home",
    "Shopping",
    "how-to",
    "household",
    "buying guides",
    "kitchen",
    "fire",
    "smoke",
    "Fire Escape"
  ],
  "textContent": "Every smart smoke alarm I’ve tested has one potentially fatal flaw, trading fewer nuisance alarms for a risky sensor strategy.",
  "title": "Best Smart Smoke Detector (and Why You Still Need a Dumb One)"
}