{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigrlbokqse2ptvvjbd4yr5et5gtepzr62f2vmxi5tuvvxgvnchnbi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ajcrkmnlj6rxdk7rltijv227/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjern4snlgf2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiazgtklwvgqh4exgtz7lmrmqooptjg3xbsqwozawpfyywobypx7lm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 95340
  },
  "path": "/pc-components/cpus/why-we-spent-50-hours-retesting-intels-core-ultra-270k-plus-and-250k-plus",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-13T11:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.tomshardware.com",
  "tags": [
    "CPUs",
    "PC Components"
  ],
  "textContent": "Although we’ve known for a long time that Intel planned to refresh its Arrow Lake CPUs, the 270K Plus and 250K Plus still posted results that were difficult to believe during our review period.",
  "title": "Why we spent 50+ hours retesting Intel’s Core Ultra 270K Plus and 250K Plus"
}