{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreihv2s6fmffp5kjt5mr7uec3n7brddtbrkq45y4twdqdm2llbu7osa"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 187040
  },
  "path": "/notes/2025-09-14-on-working-with-wizards-by-ethan-mollick/",
  "publishedAt": "2025-09-14T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "at://did:plc:aes3lokiqtv63fk62nwnjeuf/site.standard.publication/3mnin5cnq2q2a",
  "textContent": "And that suggests another risk we don't talk about enough: every time we hand work to a wizard, we lose a chance to develop our own expertise, to build the very judgment we need to evaluate the wizard's work. But I come back to the inescapable point that the results are good, at least in these cases. They are what I would expect from a graduate student working for a couple hours (or more, in the case of the re-analysis of my paper), except I got them in minutes. This is the issue with wizards: We're getting something magical, but we're also becoming the audience rather than the magician, or even the magician's assistant.",
  "title": "On Working with Wizards - by Ethan Mollick"
}