{
"path": "/a/3mj5jedepzy23-redefining-the-meme-information-units-on-social-media",
"site": "at://did:plc:aajyn6qzw67cnmwf7zxzbjdy/site.standard.publication/3mi2hxxe2v42g",
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"title": "Redefining the Meme: Information Units on Social Media",
"content": {
"$type": "app.offprint.content",
"items": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 2,
"plaintext": "0. Overview"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": "The term \"meme\" on social media has been narrowed to viral content: funny images, catchphrases, remixed templates. This usage treats the meme as a special phenomenon. Dawkins (1976) defined it as a unit of cultural transmission or imitation, with no requirement of humor or virality. The narrowed usage cannot account for the vast majority of social media posts that circulate, get referenced, and get imitated without ever going viral. This essay proposes a two-layer model that restores the meme to its original scope and redefines the \"internet meme\" as a subset, not the category itself."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 2,
"plaintext": "1. Definitions"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 34,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "Broad meme (meme as cultural unit): Any information unit circulating on social media — text, image, video, audio — that is published with the structural possibility of imitation, reference, or quotation. This definition follows Dawkins but restricts the domain to social media. The restriction matters: social media platforms provide specific replication mechanisms (repost, quote, remix) that shape the meme's behavior in ways that general cultural transmission does not."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 24,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "Viral meme (narrow meme): A subset of broad memes characterized by three properties: (1) high-frequency replication — mass copying and sharing, (2) mutation and re-performance — parody, collage, recontextualization, (3) decontextualization into template — the meme detaches from its origin and functions as a reusable format. What is commonly called an \"internet meme\" refers to this subset."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 31,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "Semantic perishability of memes: Borrowed from opaque connector theory. The process by which a meme's meaning attracts attention, gets consumed, and decays. Viral memes exhibit high semantic perishability. Broad memes vary."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 29,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "Experience-knowledge spectrum: The axis along which any social media post can be located, ranging from pure experience report (\"saw a cat on the street\") to pure knowledge sharing (\"how to configure X\"). This position is not fixed. It shifts with the receiver's context."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 15,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "Memetic fitness: The degree to which a meme achieves replication and persistence in a given platform environment. Analogous to biological fitness. Not a measure of quality or truth. A measure of replicative success under specific selection pressures."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 2,
"plaintext": "2. Propositions"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "P1: Every social media post is a meme in the broad sense. Publication on a social platform structurally opens the post to imitation, reference, and quotation. The distinction between \"a post\" and \"a meme\" is not categorical. It is gradational."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "P2: The transition from broad meme to viral meme is a continuous process, not a discrete jump. Replication accumulates. Mutation accumulates. At no single point does a post \"become\" a meme. The threshold is retrospective: we label something a viral meme after sufficient replication and mutation have been observed."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "P3: Platform affordances shape memetic selection pressure. Repost functions determine replication fidelity. Quote functions determine mutation rate. Remix tools determine decontextualization speed. The design of the platform is the environment in which memetic evolution occurs."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "P4: A meme's position on the experience-knowledge spectrum is receiver-dependent, not sender-fixed. A lunch photo is experience for the poster and potential knowledge (recipe, restaurant location) for a reader. A paper summary is knowledge in content and experience report (\"I read this\") in the act of posting."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 2,
"plaintext": "3. Corollaries"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "C1 (from P1, P2): The question \"why does one post go viral while another disappears?\" is not a question about categorical difference. It is a question about memetic fitness under specific platform conditions. The answer lies in replication dynamics, not in content quality as an intrinsic property."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "C2 (from P3): Different platforms produce different memetic selection pressures. A meme that thrives on X (high repost velocity, algorithmic amplification) may fail on Bluesky (non-viral propagation structure, follower-tree diffusion). Memetic fitness is environment-relative."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "C3 (from P3, P4): Platform design that increases mutation rate (easy remixing, quote-with-edit) accelerates decontextualization. This pushes memes toward the viral subset. Platform design that restricts mutation (repost-only, no quote) keeps memes closer to their original position on the experience-knowledge spectrum."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"facets": [
{
"index": {
"byteEnd": 2,
"byteStart": 0
},
"features": [
{
"$type": "app.offprint.richtext.facet#bold"
}
]
}
],
"plaintext": "C4 (from P1, P4): The assertive writing style analyzed in \"Style Shapes Thought\" functions as a memetic fitness modifier. It shifts posts from the experience end toward the knowledge end of the spectrum, increasing their replication value as reference material. Style is a selection pressure operating at the individual level."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 2,
"plaintext": "4. Open Questions"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": "P2 claims the broad-to-viral transition is continuous. Is there evidence of phase transitions — critical thresholds of replication beyond which qualitatively different dynamics emerge? If such thresholds exist, the continuous model requires revision. Network science literature on information cascades suggests non-linearity. The relationship between P2 and cascade models needs examination."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": "P3 treats platform affordances as the environment for memetic evolution. But users also shape the environment: community norms, moderation practices, cultural conventions around quoting and remixing. Where does the selection pressure actually originate — in the platform architecture or in the user culture built on top of it? Mezzanine practice suggests that user-created structures (opaque connectors, frequency channels) can alter memetic dynamics independently of platform design."
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": "C4 connects this framework to the style-as-cognition thesis. Can the connection be generalized? If every stylistic choice modifies memetic fitness, then authorial style is not merely self-expression. It is an evolutionary strategy. What would a taxonomy of style-as-strategy look like across social media platforms?"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.horizontalRule"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.heading",
"level": 3,
"plaintext": "Discarded Hypotheses"
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.bulletList",
"children": [
{
"content": {
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": "Memes defined exclusively by virality. This excludes the vast majority of social media information flow and contradicts Dawkins's original definition, which requires only the possibility of imitation, not its mass occurrence."
}
}
]
},
{
"$type": "app.offprint.block.text",
"plaintext": ""
}
]
},
"publishedAt": "2026-04-10T14:20:23+00:00",
"textContent": "0. Overview\nThe term \"meme\" on social media has been narrowed to viral content: funny images, catchphrases, remixed templates. This usage treats the meme as a special phenomenon. Dawkins (1976) defined it as a unit of cultural transmission or imitation, with no requirement of humor or virality. The narrowed usage cannot account for the vast majority of social media posts that circulate, get referenced, and get imitated without ever going viral. This essay proposes a two-layer model that restores the meme to its original scope and redefines the \"internet meme\" as a subset, not the category itself.\n1. Definitions\nBroad meme (meme as cultural unit): Any information unit circulating on social media — text, image, video, audio — that is published with the structural possibility of imitation, reference, or quotation. This definition follows Dawkins but restricts the domain to social media. The restriction matters: social media platforms provide specific replication mechanisms (repost, quote, remix) that shape the meme's behavior in ways that general cultural transmission does not.\nViral meme (narrow meme): A subset of broad memes characterized by three properties: (1) high-frequency replication — mass copying and sharing, (2) mutation and re-performance — parody, collage, recontextualization, (3) decontextualization into template — the meme detaches from its origin and functions as a reusable format. What is commonly called an \"internet meme\" refers to this subset.\nSemantic perishability of memes: Borrowed from opaque connector theory. The process by which a meme's meaning attracts attention, gets consumed, and decays. Viral memes exhibit high semantic perishability. Broad memes vary.\nExperience-knowledge spectrum: The axis along which any social media post can be located, ranging from pure experience report (\"saw a cat on the street\") to pure knowledge sharing (\"how to configure X\"). This position is not fixed. It shifts with the receiver's context.\nMemetic fitness: The degree to which a meme achieves replication and persistence in a given platform environment. Analogous to biological fitness. Not a measure of quality or truth. A measure of replicative success under specific selection pressures.\n2. Propositions\nP1: Every social media post is a meme in the broad sense. Publication on a social platform structurally opens the post to imitation, reference, and quotation. The distinction between \"a post\" and \"a meme\" is not categorical. It is gradational.\nP2: The transition from broad meme to viral meme is a continuous process, not a discrete jump. Replication accumulates. Mutation accumulates. At no single point does a post \"become\" a meme. The threshold is retrospective: we label something a viral meme after sufficient replication and mutation have been observed.\nP3: Platform affordances shape memetic selection pressure. Repost functions determine replication fidelity. Quote functions determine mutation rate. Remix tools determine decontextualization speed. The design of the platform is the environment in which memetic evolution occurs.\nP4: A meme's position on the experience-knowledge spectrum is receiver-dependent, not sender-fixed. A lunch photo is experience for the poster and potential knowledge (recipe, restaurant location) for a reader. A paper summary is knowledge in content and experience report (\"I read this\") in the act of posting.\n3. Corollaries\nC1 (from P1, P2): The question \"why does one post go viral while another disappears?\" is not a question about categorical difference. It is a question about memetic fitness under specific platform conditions. The answer lies in replication dynamics, not in content quality as an intrinsic property.\nC2 (from P3): Different platforms produce different memetic selection pressures. A meme that thrives on X (high repost velocity, algorithmic amplification) may fail on Bluesky (non-viral propagation structure, follower-tree diffusion). Memetic fitness is environment-relative.\nC3 (from P3, P4): Platform design that increases mutation rate (easy remixing, quote-with-edit) accelerates decontextualization. This pushes memes toward the viral subset. Platform design that restricts mutation (repost-only, no quote) keeps memes closer to their original position on the experience-knowledge spectrum.\nC4 (from P1, P4): The assertive writing style analyzed in \"Style Shapes Thought\" functions as a memetic fitness modifier. It shifts posts from the experience end toward the knowledge end of the spectrum, increasing their replication value as reference material. Style is a selection pressure operating at the individual level.\n4. Open Questions\nP2 claims the broad-to-viral transition is continuous. Is there evidence of phase transitions — critical thresholds of replication beyond which qualitatively different dynamics emerge? If such thresholds exist, the continuous model requires revision. Network science literature on information cascades suggests non-linearity. The relationship between P2 and cascade models needs examination.\nP3 treats platform affordances as the environment for memetic evolution. But users also shape the environment: community norms, moderation practices, cultural conventions around quoting and remixing. Where does the selection pressure actually originate — in the platform architecture or in the user culture built on top of it? Mezzanine practice suggests that user-created structures (opaque connectors, frequency channels) can alter memetic dynamics independently of platform design.\nC4 connects this framework to the style-as-cognition thesis. Can the connection be generalized? If every stylistic choice modifies memetic fitness, then authorial style is not merely self-expression. It is an evolutionary strategy. What would a taxonomy of style-as-strategy look like across social media platforms?\n\n---\nDiscarded Hypotheses\n- Memes defined exclusively by virality. This excludes the vast majority of social media information flow and contradicts Dawkins's original definition, which requires only the possibility of imitation, not its mass occurrence."
}