{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig5anymknehn2lcbrhpmjgt5t5dctl44mlz77g4ggrovmtqc5n4x4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:7tu2o2757e4cw4vg72cigtls/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnwxie4nqmc2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibwahdgytgyeskhfhgr7zk7kbw4dffxcp4n22ccehhl7bbhucmrhu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1313384
  },
  "path": "/2026/06/09/for-women-scotland-section-7-biological-sex/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-09T15:09:45.000Z",
  "site": "https://tacc.org.uk",
  "tags": [
    "Opinions",
    "Equality",
    "Human Rights",
    "LGBTQIA+",
    "Transgender",
    "Transgender Rights",
    "Biological Sex: For Women Scotland, and Section 7",
    "Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective"
  ],
  "textContent": "Since the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, much of the public discussion has focused on a single conclusion: the Court held that the terms “sex”, “man” and “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to ‘biological sex’ rather than ‘certificated sex’. For many campaigners, that was where […]\n\nThe post Biological Sex: For Women Scotland, and Section 7 appeared first on Trans Advocacy and Complaints Collective.",
  "title": "Biological Sex: For Women Scotland, and Section 7"
}