{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://frankhecker.com/2010/07/27/howard-county-and-civic-equality-in-the-21st-century-part-2/",
  "path": "/2010/07/27/howard-county-and-civic-equality-in-the-21st-century-part-2/",
  "publishedAt": "2010-07-28T03:53:10.000Z",
  "site": "at://did:plc:77mn3ult3b72tpvtqqva6tat/site.standard.publication/3mpfmfpu4u72n",
  "tags": [
    "howardcounty"
  ],
  "textContent": "In my [previous post][previou] I introduced the topic of same-sex marriage as a civil right, only to digress into a discussion of how many gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) people might actually live in Howard County.  Now I’ll return to the question of same-sex marriage, starting with an discussion of how many people in Howard County might be candidates for it (or even already married).\n\nAs I noted previously, the US Census Bureau does not create or publish direct estimates of the LGBT population.  However since 1990 the Census Bureau has surveyed the population to determine the number of unmarried partners (in addition to the data that’s always been collected on married couples), and as part of that survey has collected data on the sex of each partner.  This data has in turn been used by [others][] to create estimates of the number of same-sex couples as well as the overall LGBT population both [nationally][nationa] and [at a state level][at a st].\n\nUnfortunately these estimates have been fraught with problems (beyond just the garden-variety statistical problems having to do with limited sample sizes).  In particular the Census estimates of same-sex unmarried partners were historically too high, and more recently the Census survey methodology hasn’t properly accounted for same-sex couples who were in fact married (i.e., in Massachusetts or elsewhere).  The first problem was not properly corrected for until 2008.  The second problem is being addressed in the 2010 census, when for the first time the Census Bureau will generate an official estimate of the number of same-sex couples who consider themselves to be spouses (e.g., married or in a civil union or domestic partnership arrangement).\n\nThus only when the 2010 census results are released will it be possible to get a reasonably clear picture of how many same-sex couples (married or unmarried) exist in the US, Maryland, and Howard County.  In the meantime the best public Census data is from the 2008 American Community Survey, which [estimates][estimat] that 0.5% of all US households consist of same-sex unmarried partners.  Because the ACS estimates are based on only a small sample of the population (about 1% of all households), and because the number of same-sex couples is so small (less than 1% of all households in almost all jurisdictions), using ACS data below the national level is problematic; in many cases the margins of error on the estimates are comparable to the estimates themselves.\n\nHowever we can get at least a general sense of the relative numbers of same-sex couples in various local jurisdictions by looking at the ACS estimates.  As you might expect, the [District of Columbia][Distric] has lots of same-sex couples (about 1.4% of all households per the ACS).  [Montgomery County][Montgom] has about half that fraction (about 0.6% of all households), [Howard County][Howard] about a third (0.4%), and [Frederick County][Frederi] about a quarter (0.3%).  This is reminiscent of the figures on comparative ethnic diversity in Montgomery, Howard, and Frederick that I discussed in an [earlier post][earlier].\n\nNote however that unlike the situation with ethnic diversity, the proportion of same-sex couples in Howard County is actually below the overall national average.  It’s not much below the national average, which makes me think that the total LGBT population of Howard County is closer to the 3% figure than to the sub-1% figure of my range of estimates in the last post.  But it does put paid to the idea that Howard County is a bastion of diversity in this particular context.\n\nFinally, note that the above Maryland counties do have higher proportions of same-sex couples than comparable counties in Virginia: Montgomery County has relatively more same-sex couples than [Fairfax County][Fairfax] (0.6% vs. 0.4%), and Howard County relatively more than [Loudoun County][Loudoun] (0.4% vs. 0.2%).  At first glance this seems to be consistent with the conventional “blue state vs. red state” narrative: As a supposedly liberal Democratic-leaning state Maryland is presumably a more hospitable place for same-sex couples than a conservative Republican-leaning state like Virginia (where one of the Ten Commandments seems to be “[Thou shalt not enter into a marriage-like contract with your same-sex partner][Thou sh]”).\n\nBut wait a minute: Both [Maryland][Marylan] and [Virginia][Virgini] have about the same number of same-sex couples, at about 0.4% of all households (slightly under the national average).  In addition, [Arlington County][Arlingt] has even more same-sex couples than DC, at 1.5% of all households, and thus seems to be more like the part of DC it once was than part of Virginia.\n\nSo what’s going on here?  Why isn’t Maryland attracting more same-sex couples than it is?  Why can’t Howard County, that supposed haven of diversity and tolerance, attract relatively more same-sex couples than Maryland as a whole, or the nation as a whole?  And why hasn’t this supposedly ultra-liberal state enacted a same-sex marriage law, or even a law to allow civil unions?  More on that in the [next and final post][next an] in this series.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n[previou]: {{< relref \"2010-07-27-howard-county-and-civic-equality-in-the-21st-century-part-1.md\" >}}\n[others]: http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/\n[nationa]: http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf\n[at a st]: http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/MarylandCensusSnapshot.pdf\n[estimat]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Distric]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=04000US11&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Montgom]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-geo_id=05000US24027&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Howard]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-geo_id=05000US24027&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Frederi]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=05000US24021&-format=&-_lang=en\n[earlier]: {{< relref \"2010-07-10-howard-county-and-ethnic-diversity-in-the-21st-century-part-1.md\" >}}\n[Fairfax]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=05000US51059&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Loudoun]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=05000US51107&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Thou sh]: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+20-45.3\n[Marylan]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=04000US24&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Virgini]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=04000US51&-format=&-_lang=en\n[Arlingt]: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-context=st&-qr_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_S1101&-ds_name=ACS_2008_1YR_G00_&-CONTEXT=st&-tree_id=308&-redoLog=true&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=05000US51013&-format=&-_lang=en\n[next an]: {{< relref \"2010-07-28-howard-county-and-civic-equality-in-the-21st-century-part-3.md\" >}}\n[Samese]: http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf\n[Defense]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act\n[Changes]: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/files/changes-to-acs-2007-to-2008.pdf\n[LGBT fa]: http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/factSheet_General_LGBT.pdf\n[Our Fam]: http://ourfamiliescount.org/\n[congres]: http://www.prb.org/Articles/2009/2010censustestimony.aspx",
  "title": "Howard County and civic equality in the 21st century, part 2"
}