{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihvjt4yxjq44fphenxfnmmmx4fjmehucgirfv4nf3xvci2w5l26qa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:73txmnzc4imhrv5q7azno3up/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjkniylaxwd2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigxrzhrphuubjgumjnt43y7vsiclfjpkwvfnp2adipasngf2jugce"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 162005
  },
  "path": "/opinion/166426-trump-iran-ceasefire-no-document-analysis/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-15T18:44:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://english.pravda.ru",
  "tags": [
    "Opinion"
  ],
  "textContent": "On April 8, Donald Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The statement did not come from the White House but from the social network Truth Social-before any official documentation appeared. This fact alone raised questions, because such decisions are usually formalized in documents, not published as commentary.\nInstead of classical diplomacy, we saw a political statement followed by no transparent legal framework. From that moment, it became clear that this was less an agreement and more a political construct that each side would interpret in its own way.\nThe main question that remains unanswered today is: who has actually seen the document on which the parties allegedly agreed?",
  "title": "No Text, No Terms: How the US–Iran Ceasefire Became an Information War"
}