{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihg4cnp3o63hrb7qcr3ovloodugejycdghbnu3jurmbomqxe7ijna",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:6o2wbpivvsog6cfn5xr2so4t/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj7f5shougp2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifcqerfwnnsqdribppasfcfzm7ovwq4hy7scxsm5f5jevk3omcshe"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 94833
  },
  "path": "/issues/2026-4-11/sexting-with-prince-harry",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://airmail.news",
  "tags": [
    "Air Mail",
    "London",
    "READ ON"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n  Tally-ho, my fine saucy young trollop!\n\n##### The Prince of Wails’ lawsuit against the _Daily Mail_ was meant to defend his privacy. Instead, it has revealed a carnival of embarrassing texts about “fun weekends of naughtiness” and Harry’s nickname—”H bomb”\n\nBy Rosamund Urwin\n\nIt is Prince Harry’s last great gamble in his seven-year war with the tabloids. When the Duke of Sussex decided to take on Associated Newspapers, publisher of the _Daily Mail_ and _The Mail on Sunday,_ he was fueled by almost three decades of fury at how newspapers had treated his family.\n\nWhat he perhaps did not envisage was the circus the claim would unleash in the High Court: the release of flirty text messages in which Harry was branded “Mr Mischief” by a journalist; revelations about a meeting on a London roundabout; and eccentric legal analogies involving donkeys. The big question now is, will it pay off? READ ON",
  "title": "Sexting with Prince Harry"
}