{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieurlhj6cl2morzvgfuvizjg7eafz2dkv5ic3q7ydtvilzefcnllq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:6o2wbpivvsog6cfn5xr2so4t/app.bsky.feed.post/3mekeuzq6cq62"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifpfihttfmd2zvrh7ofrfsyny5qbovcq2jlyikcmr6mxp7k3lymni"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 107137
  },
  "path": "/issues/2026-2-7/its-a-vogue-eat-dogue-world",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-07T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://airmail.news",
  "tags": [
    "Air Mail",
    "Los Angeles,",
    "READ ON"
  ],
  "textContent": "  An epic showdown not seen since David vs. Goliath.\n\n##### Condé Nast is suing a tiny Beverly Hills dog magazine for trademark infringement\n\nBy Carolina de Armas\n\nEveryone loves an underdog story. Erin Brockovich vs. PG&E. Seabiscuit vs. War Admiral. Elle Woods vs. that snooty and dense ex-boyfriend of hers. Now another such saga is unfolding in real time as _Dogue_ —a canine-fashion magazine run single-handedly by a Beverly Hills dog-mom—prepares to take on _Vogue,_ via its parent company, Condé Nast.\n\nIt all started on December 5 at the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Los Angeles, when Condé Nast filed a federal lawsuit against _Dogue’_ s publisher, Tasty Work LLC, alleging trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. The complaint claims that READ ON",
  "title": "It's a Vogue-Eat-Dogue World"
}