{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidwryrmakbqwhj2pvqqv6526jrnhimuco6b3youdomhvvnqocwmjm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:5tifsg4pg5v4lpfach3kedsm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfst7wfqon72"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidday2vs4dkqqw2uhpnkhvuffkunsi6dbsitvspiv5foj3jyz64ya"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1221748
  },
  "path": "/2026/02/refuting-creationism-global-spread-of.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-27T00:44:00.002Z",
  "site": "http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.com",
  "tags": [
    "250 million-year-old amphibian fossils from Australia reveal global spread of ‘sea-salamanders’",
    "first",
    "published in the _Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology_",
    "a University of New South Wales news item",
    "article in _The Conversation_",
    "Lachlan Hart",
    "UNSW Sydney",
    "study",
    "Cosgriff and Garbutt",
    "The Conversation",
    "original article",
    "(CC BY 4.0)",
    "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)",
    "Click for My Books",
    "Tweet Link",
    "Oxfam"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\n\n\n_Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis_ (foreground) and _Aphaneramma_ (middle ground)\n\n\n\nAI-Generated image (ChatGPT 5.2)\n\n250 million-year-old amphibian fossils from Australia reveal global spread of ‘sea-salamanders’\n\nSince the beginning of 2026, with only a few days spent on other projects, I’ve been able to write one or two articles every day about yet another paper that comprehensively refutes basic creationist dogma and illustrates the strength of the Theory of Evolution as the grand unifying theory of biology, without which little of it would make sense. Over the same period, there has not been the faintest hint of a paper providing peer-reviewed support for ID creationism, or even suggesting that the Theory of Evolution is in crisis and in need of replacement because it cannot explain the facts.\n\nToday is no exception, with the second such paper. The first showed how people were using signs and patterns to communicate ideas 30,000 years before creationists think Earth was created; this one discusses the fossil record from 250 million years ago and what it tells us about the evolution of early marine tetrapods — animals that had returned to the marine environment from which their ancestors had originally emerged and had become apex predators. In this case, the focus is on an amphibian that had converged on a body shape resembling a crocodile.\n\nIt also shows how an environmental catastrophe — itself utterly inconsistent with creationist notions of a created perfection ideally suited for life — created opportunities that could be exploited by the evolutionary process, allowing surviving lineages to radiate into new species, exactly as evolutionary theory predicts. Again, this stands in stark contrast to the childish notion of special creation without ancestors by some unexplained magical process.\n\nThe paper, by an international team led by Dr Lachlan Hart of the University of New South Wales, has just been published in the _Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology_. It explains how fossils of a marine amphibian, _Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis_ , found in the Blina Shale and originally described in 1972 from material recovered in the 1960s, turn out on re-examination to represent two different species, one of which rapidly achieved a near-global distribution, probably by coastal dispersal around the supercontinent Gondwana.\n\nThese species appear to have flourished soon after the ‘Great Dying’, the end-Permian mass extinction event that saw the disappearance of 90–96% of all species (around 96% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial species).\n\nDr Hart has explained his team’s research and its significance in a University of New South Wales news item. He has also written an article in _The Conversation_, reproduced below under a Creative Commons licence, reformatted for stylistic consistency. First, background information on the end Permian mass extinction or 'Great Dying':\n\n\n> The ‘Great Dying’^ Causes and Consequences. What Caused It?\n>\n>  Most evidence points to a cascade of environmental catastrophes triggered by massive volcanic activity in what is now Siberia — the eruptions that formed the Siberian Traps. These eruptions lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and released vast quantities of:\n>\n>   * **Carbon dioxide (CO₂)** → intense global warming\n>   * **Sulphur dioxide (SO₂)** → short-term cooling and acid rain\n>   * **Methane (CH₄)** → amplified greenhouse warming\n>   * **Toxic metals and aerosols** → ecological poisoning\nThe likely chain of events included:\n>   1. **Rapid global warming**\n>  Average temperatures rose by an estimated 8–10°C or more. Polar regions became temperate; tropical oceans may have become lethally hot for many organisms.\n>   2. **Ocean acidification**\n>  Increased atmospheric CO₂ dissolved into seawater, lowering pH and impairing shell-forming organisms such as brachiopods, corals and ammonoids.\n>   3. **Ocean anoxia (oxygen depletion)**\n>  Warmer waters hold less oxygen. Stratified oceans prevented mixing, leading to widespread “dead zones”. Evidence suggests large parts of the oceans became anoxic and even euxinic (rich in toxic hydrogen sulphide).\n>   4. **Collapse of food webs**\n>  With primary producers and reef systems devastated, marine ecosystems unravelled from the bottom up.\n>   5. **Terrestrial ecosystem breakdown**\n>  Acid rain, extreme heat, drought, and wildfires destroyed vast forested regions. Soil erosion increased dramatically.\n\n>  Some researchers also suggest that warming destabilised methane clathrates (methane trapped in ocean sediments), causing additional greenhouse feedback — a runaway amplification of climate change.\n>\n>\n> * * *\n>\n>\n>  What Were the Effects?\n>\n>  The extinction reshaped life on Earth in profound ways:\n>\n>   * **Reef systems collapsed** and did not fully recover for millions of years.\n>   * **Many dominant Permian groups vanished** , including trilobites (already declining), rugose corals, and several synapsid lineages.\n>   * **Ecosystems simplified dramatically** , with low diversity and unstable communities in the early Triassic.\n>   * Recovery was **slow and uneven** , taking 5–10 million years for biodiversity to approach previous levels.\n\n>\n> * * *\n>\n>\n>  Evolutionary Aftermath\n>\n>  Catastrophic though it was, the extinction created ecological vacancies. With dominant competitors removed:\n>\n>   * Early archosaurs began diversifying.\n>   * Marine reptiles would later radiate into newly available niches.\n>   * Surviving amphibians, such as temnospondyls, exploited freshwater and coastal environments.\n>   * Ultimately, this reset paved the way for the Mesozoic world — including the rise of dinosaurs.\n\n>  In evolutionary terms, the Great Dying represents a dramatic example of contingency: mass extinction pruned the tree of life, and the branches that survived determined the shape of all subsequent ecosystems.\n>\n>\n> * * *\n>\n>\n>  This event provides a striking illustration that Earth’s history includes prolonged periods of extreme instability and devastation — entirely at odds with any notion of an originally perfect, unchanging world designed in a single creative episode.\n\n Published: February 22, 2026 11.05pm GMT\n\n250 million‑year‑old amphibian fossils from Australia reveal global spread of ‘sea‑salamanders’\n\nAncient marine amphibians Erythrobatrachus (foreground) and Aphaneramma (background).\n\nPollyanna von Knorring (Swedish Museum of Natural History)\n\nLachlan Hart, _UNSW Sydney_ The Kimberley region in the north-west corner of Western Australia is full of rugged ranges and gorges, and long stretches of red soil and rocky ground. The dry seasons are long, and the wet seasons often flood the Martuwarra Fitzroy River – an artery to the Indian Ocean – in the region’s south.\n\nBut if you were to travel back to the Early Triassic period, 250 million years ago, you would see a very different landscape. Back then, the land was covered in brackish water and was more like a mudflat, on the shore of a shallow bay.\n\nInhabiting this area were creatures a far stretch from the dingoes, rock wallabies and livestock that populate the region today. Strange amphibians, called temnospondyls, which looked like a cross between a salamander and a crocodile, dominated this era, feeding on fish and other small animals.\n\nA new study colleagues and I have just published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology sheds new light on these animals. It shows for the first time how they were able to become an evolutionary success story.\n\n\n\n\nSome 250 million years ago, the Kimberly region was covered in brackish water, similar to Roebuck Bay near present-day Broome, Western Australia.\n\n\nLost – then found\n\nPalaeontologists uncovered fossils of these weird animals in rocks (known as the Blina shale) on Noonkanbah station, roughly 250 kilometres inland of Broome, during field expeditions in the 1960s.\n\nTemnospondyls are an incredibly long and diverse lineage of vertebrates. Their fossil record extends some 210 million years, from the Carboniferous period through to the Cretaceous. They include prehistoric animals such as _Eryops_ and _Koolasuchus_. Their story is one of great survival – one of the few vertebrate groups that persisted through the two mass extinctions at the end of the Permian and Triassic periods.\n\nThe temnospondyl discovered on Noonkanbah station was called _Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis_. It was named in 1972 by Cosgriff and Garbutt based on three fossil skull pieces that were retrieved on those field expeditions in the 1960s.\n\nThe specimens were sent to several museum collections in Australia and the United States. And some time in the following 50 years or so, they were lost.\n\nLuckily, the Western Australian Museum retained a high quality plaster cast of one of the pieces. But our team was determined to find out more about these enigmatic fossils. We were completely blown away when one of the lost pieces turned up in a museum collection at Berkeley, in the US.\n\nOne species becomes two\n\nOnce we could look at these two pieces of _Erythrobatrachus_ , we could see that they actually belonged to two different species of temnospondyl.\n\nOne of the original fossils was definitely unique enough to maintain the _Erythrobatrachus_ name. The other one was more like a previously described, and well-known temnospondyl called _Aphaneramma_.\n\nWhile both animals would have been roughly the same size (with skulls of about 40 centimetres long when complete), the shape of their skulls indicated different diets and hunting strategies.\n\n_Erythrobatrachus_ had a broader, more robust head and would have been a top predator in its environment.\n\n_Aphaneramma_ , on the other hand, had a long, thin snout probably adapted for catching small fish. They both lived in the same habitat, coexisting by hunting different prey.\n\n\n\n\nAncient marine amphibians Erythrobatrachus (foreground) and Aphaneramma (background).\n\n\nPollyanna von Knorring (Swedish Museum of Natural History)\n\nA global spread\n\nModern amphibians are extremely sensitive to salt levels in water. This is why marine environments which have high salinity are generally not a place where amphibians like to live.\n\nTemnospondyls of the family Trematosauria, to which both _Erythrobatrachus_ and _Aphaneramma_ belong, were apparently unbothered by salt water, as trematosaurid fossils are found in marine deposits around the world.\n\nIn fact, fossils of _Aphaneramma_ have been found in localities of similar age to the Blina Shale – in Svalbard, Russia, Pakistan and Madagascar.\n\nTrematosaurs are particularly notable as their fossils are found in rocks which date less than 1 million years after the mass extinction event at the end of the Permian period, also known as the Great Dying. This was the most catastrophic mass extinction in Earth’s history.\n\nConfirmation that _Aphaneramma’s_ range also included Australia shows these animals were dispersing worldwide during the earliest parts of the Mesozoic era.\n\nOur research adds an exclamation point to just how adaptable temnospondyls were. They had an amazing ability to utilise a plethora of ecological niches to survive, even in the face of extreme global change – proving they were definitely one of evolution’s success stories.\nLachlan Hart, Lecturer, School of Education, _UNSW Sydney_\n\nThis article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.\n\n\n\nPublished by _The Conversation_.\nOpen access. (CC BY 4.0)\n\nShow publication details\n\n\n> ABSTRACT\n>  Tetrapods emerged as dominant marine predators during the earliest Triassic, with trematosaurid temnospondyls representing one of the first groups to radiate globally after the cataclysmic end-Permian mass extinction. Trematosaurids were superficially ‘crocodile-like’ amphibians with elongate tapered skulls and dorsolaterally oriented orbits that suggest adaptation for living within the water column. In Australia, marine trematosaurid fossils have only been recovered from the Blina Shale—an upper Induan–lower Olenekian paralic unit that crops out in the Canning Basin of remote northwestern Western Australia. The Blina Shale was deposited along the edge of a brackish seaway that inundated the East Gondwana interior rift-sag system separating what is today the Australian and Indian landmasses. Historically, a single trematosaurid species, Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis, was described from the Blina Shale. However, recent survey of the remains reveals a morphological composite combining the broad-skulled holotype of E. noonkanbahensis, with an extremely narrow-skulled referred specimen that closely resembles the cosmopolitan lonchorhynchine genus _Aphaneramma_. The Blina Shale temnospondyl assemblage therefore integrated multiple marine trematosaurids that were locally, and likely stratigraphically segregated from more benthic-oriented and non-marine rhytidosteids, capitosauroids, and brachyopids. These distinct temnospondyl communities probably occupied a succession of regressive habitats subject to increasing hyposalinity. Finally, although integrating predominantly southern Gondwanan endemics, the Blina Shale temnospondyl assemblage apparently included some widely distributed marine taxa that may have used the contiguous Pangean coastal fringes to facilitate long-distance dispersal.\n>\n>\n>\n> [Kear, B. P., Campione, N. E., Siversson, M., Bazzi, M., & Hart, L. J. (2026).\n>  **Revision of the trematosaurid _Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis_ confirms a cryptic marine temnospondyl community from the Lower Triassic of Western Australia.**\n>  _Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology._ https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2025.2601224](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2025.2601224)\n>\n>  Copyright: © 2026 The authors.\n>  Published by Taylor & Francis. Open access.\n>  Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)\n\n\nWhat this study demonstrates — yet again — is how palaeontology works. Fossils collected decades ago, re-examined with fresh comparative material and modern analytical methods, refine our understanding of past biodiversity and biogeography. A specimen once thought to represent a single species is revealed to record two distinct lineages, one of which dispersed widely across Gondwana in the ecological vacuum left by the end-Permian catastrophe. That is not ad hoc storytelling; it is hypothesis, re-analysis, correction and refinement — precisely how science progresses.\n\nIt also reinforces a central evolutionary principle: mass extinction does not “reset” life to a pristine beginning. It prunes the tree. The lineages that survive inherit a destabilised world rich in ecological opportunity, and natural selection acts on variation already present within those surviving populations. The rapid radiation of marine tetrapods after the Great Dying is exactly what evolutionary theory predicts when niches open and competition is temporarily reduced.\n\nFor creationism, however, each of these findings compounds the difficulty. The fossil record extends hundreds of millions of years beyond any proposed recent creation, documents successive faunas replacing one another through deep time, and shows clear patterns of descent, dispersal and adaptation following environmental upheaval. There is no evidence of sudden, independent creation of fully formed organisms without ancestry. Instead, there is continuity, modification and contingency.\n\nTwo hundred and fifty million years ago, in the wake of the most devastating extinction event in Earth’s history, amphibians were experimenting with new marine lifestyles along the shores of Gondwana. Their fossils remain as quiet testimony to a dynamic, ancient planet — one whose history is written in rock layers, not in myth.\n\n\n\n* * *\n\n\n\n\n\n**Advertisement**\n\n\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$14.20 UK\n$11.20\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$14.15 UK\n$11.20\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$12.90 UK\n£10.00\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$16.00 UK\n£12.60\n\n\n\n\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$12.50UK\n£9.30\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$12.00UK\n£9.93\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$12.50UK\n£10.00\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$10.50UK\n£8.30\n\n\n\n\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$12.00UK\n£10.00\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$15.00UK\n£12.29\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$7.50UK\n£5.75\n\n**Amazon**  USA\n$10.20UK\n£8.30\n\n\n**All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.**\n\n**Prices correct at time of publication. Click here for current prices.**\n\n\n\n**Advertisement**\n\nClick for My Books\n\n\n\n### Thank you for sharing!\n\n\n\n\nTweet Link\n\nBlue Sky\n\n \n\nFlip to Flipboard\n\n\n\n\n\nIf you've enjoyed my blog please show your appreciation by giving to a great cause - Oxfam\nBe Humankind. Feed the world.",
  "title": "Refuting Creationism - Global Spread of Giant Predatory 'Sea Salamanders' - 250 Million Years Before 'Creation Week'",
  "updatedAt": "2026-02-27T00:44:45.612Z"
}