{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihn46zzrhcmf6ktinkzewwv5uieslgcd3rb7bludahpthztqzlgeq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:4tuge3k3comfj4nfvqnwkemn/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgmblg3m7xk2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreign5bgxjehqqy6hucynbjbaqnhl2rt4cikddalh2d42hhzfurgwxu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 71266
  },
  "path": "/user/Natfoot/diary/408333",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-08T18:04:48.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.openstreetmap.org",
  "tags": [
    "osm.org/note/5066887#map=15/41.40203/-73.62096",
    "osm.org/note/4680502#map=15/49.49511/-121.22581"
  ],
  "textContent": "Rail trails with route relations with railway=abandoned to denote a rail trail is not working. When the named “bike route” enters city streets or along side walks where the railroad never went this becomes and tagging nightmare.\n\nI have had to remove railway=abandoned from a route relation in British Columbia and in New Hampshire where these were both issues. osm.org/note/5066887#map=15/41.40203/-73.62096\n\nosm.org/note/4680502#map=15/49.49511/-121.22581\n\nCan we find a better tags to mark bike routes with rail trail?\nthis is specific to route relations and not current tags for infrastructure, railway=abandoned still works for infrastructure\n\nYours in Mapping Natfoot\n\nthis is related to my other project on routing and bike routes. ask if you want to know more.",
  "title": "Rail Trails and railway=abandoned"
}