{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifdurkbtv4dyy5clgf7nrrqklee3wp77eoslqpj4loxpyprba2taq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:4tuge3k3comfj4nfvqnwkemn/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgaf7ht5xw22"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreign5bgxjehqqy6hucynbjbaqnhl2rt4cikddalh2d42hhzfurgwxu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 71266
  },
  "path": "/user/jwheare/diary/408308",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-03T13:37:38.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.openstreetmap.org",
  "tags": [
    "wetland=tidalflat",
    "Change of definition to mainly encompass mud and discourage use on sand flats",
    "openstreetmap-carto PR: #5067 Use dedicated style for landcover polygons over water"
  ],
  "textContent": "I started a new wiki talk page discussion on the conflicting/controversial usage of the wetland=tidalflat tag regarding implied and explicit surface types:\n\n  * Change of definition to mainly encompass mud and discourage use on sand flats\n\n\n\nAlso posted a comment on positive related changes being worked on by the carto team:\n\n  * openstreetmap-carto PR: #5067 Use dedicated style for landcover polygons over water\n\n",
  "title": "wetland=tidalflat controversy"
}