{
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"bskyPostRef": {
"cid": "bafyreiclgm2nnkfozlsck6hsps2k5qaan4zwgcnl42fpfohrz5iea2csya",
"uri": "at://did:plc:4rgrdigiftglskeax4wvmsev/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnjnnjkbqu22"
},
"coverImage": {
"$type": "blob",
"ref": {
"$link": "bafkreiflo6xt7is6b2iafwghkjahlgggocme5jwjsbeuqqwcywuvjhmszm"
},
"mimeType": "image/png",
"size": 24783
},
"path": "/abs/2606.04572v1",
"publishedAt": "2026-06-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"site": "https://arxiv.org",
"tags": [
"Tim A. Hartmann",
"Dániel Marx"
],
"textContent": "**Authors:** Tim A. Hartmann, Dániel Marx\n\nThe distance-d variants of Independent Set and Dominating Set problems have been extensively studied from different algorithmic viewpoints. In particular, the complexity of these problems are well understood on bounded-treewidth graphs [Katsikarelis, Lampis, and Paschos, Discret. Appl. Math 2022][Borradaile and Le, IPEC 2016]: given a tree decomposition of width t, the two problems can be solved in time $d^t \\cdot n^{O(1)}$ and $(2d + 1)t \\cdot n^{O(1)}$, respectively. Furthermore, assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), the base constants are best possible in these running times: they cannot be improved to $d-ε$ and $2d+1-ε$, respectively, for any $ε > 0$. We investigate continuous versions of these problems in a setting introduced by Megiddo and Tamir [SICOMP 1983], where every edge is modeled by a unit-length interval of points. In the δ-Dispersion problem, the task is to find a maximum number of points (possibly inside edges) that are pairwise at distance at least δ from each other. Similarly, in the δ-Covering problem, the task is to find a minimum number of points (possibly inside edges) such that every point of the graph (including those inside edges) is at distance at most δ from the selected point set. We provide a comprehensive understanding of these two problems on bounded-treewidth graphs.",
"title": "Independence and Domination on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: Integer, Rational, and Irrational Distances"
}