{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihvkcp3hcstlv4bvl6jpy34krmclhxbfehuhnfiwrsl32nqfxbrui",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:4n6wgsqsqm6q2hjncgwmreey/app.bsky.feed.post/3mohuecpuuuf2"
  },
  "path": "/post/52118362",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-17T07:00:15.000Z",
  "site": "https://programming.dev",
  "tags": [
    "Linux",
    "kiri",
    "2 comments"
  ],
  "textContent": "submitted by kiri to linux\n4 points | 2 comments\n\n(No provocation)\n\nI see these reasons:\n\n  * newbie\n  * lazy (don’t wanna edit config files etc.)\n  * unique features (like assistant/toolbox, optimized kernels)\n  * wanna check how different systems are set up (that’s rather distrohopping)\n\n\n\nPersonally, I used manjaro i3 when I was beigginer and wanted to see how tiling WM should be configured (check out ranger config, for example). But after some time, I don’t see reasons why not to just customize pure arch (same with debian and debian-based distros).",
  "title": "Users of Arch-based distros, why don't you use pure Arch?"
}