{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih3hqy4tbhv4z6xr4ohceghllc6eswhgsxuikdpb24o7rvyty4mky",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:4n6wgsqsqm6q2hjncgwmreey/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgklemk6b3j2"
  },
  "path": "/post/46831665",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-07T16:32:36.000Z",
  "site": "https://programming.dev",
  "tags": [
    "Privacy",
    "cm0002",
    "10 comments",
    "https://youtube.com/watch?v=JaHD9yLY1WY",
    "inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=JaHD9yLY1WY"
  ],
  "textContent": "submitted by cm0002 to privacy\n74 points | 10 comments\nhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=JaHD9yLY1WY\n\nAlt link: inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=JaHD9yLY1WY\n\n> > Japan protects children online very differently to the UK. (Shout out to red rose for the heads up - it was interesting.) While the UK Online Safety Act is driving biometric age verification and platform-based ID checks, Japan has taken another route: mobile carrier filtering enabled by default for under-18s, combined with parental control and digital literacy.\n>>\n>> There is no nationwide social media ban in Japan. Instead, age controls typically sit at the telecom/SIM registration layer rather than at individual platforms.\n>>\n>> In this video I explain: • Japan’s 2008 Youth Internet Environment framework\n>  • How mobile carriers determine age at SIM registration\n>  • Why filtering is enabled by default for minors\n>  • The parental opt-out (waiver) mechanism\n>  • The privacy trade-offs compared to UK-style age verification\n>  This isn’t “no regulation” — it’s a different regulatory architecture.\n>\n> Sources:\n>\n> Nippon.com – Overview of Japan’s youth internet law and filtering model\n>  www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/d01099/\n>\n> Children and Families Agency (Japan) – Sixth Basic Plan outline (youth internet measures)\n>  www.cfa.go.jp/assets/contents/node/basic_page/fiel…\n>\n> NTT Docomo – “Request for Not Using Filtering Services” (waiver form example)\n>  www.docomo.ne.jp/english/binary/pdf/support/proced…\n>\n> The Japan Times – Commentary on social media regulation debate\n>  www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2024/11/28/japan/s…\n>\n> The Japan Times – Reporting on youth victims and social media concerns\n>  www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/27/japan/crime-l…\n>\n> If you’re following UK Online Safety Act developments, this comparison shows that “protecting children online” does not automatically require biometric ID checks across platforms — but every model comes with trade-offs.\n>\n> Let me know in the comments: would you prefer telecom-level filtering, or platform-based age verificatio",
  "title": "How Japan Protects Children Online — Without Mass ID Checks"
}