{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifopujorwxowifvgywxswkcxkqt2carlr2cafirydlq7kqkfvfxuy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:4jjxx3max7tcdxwmdkjrnyj4/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjpyewbotxa2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibho5bi3rztoinlgmh4hl6nanfpue6uiajllaag47ikvli6wu5vyq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 33280
  },
  "path": "/bong-joon-ho-david-fincher",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-17T21:45:02.000Z",
  "site": "https://nofilmschool.com",
  "tags": [
    "Blocking",
    "Bong joon ho",
    "Bong joon-ho",
    "Cinematography",
    "Directing",
    "Directing actors",
    "Directing advice",
    "David fincher",
    "www.youtube.com",
    "50 takes per scene",
    "Screen Daily",
    "The New York Times",
    "what makes Fincher's filmmaking style tick",
    "this is worth a read",
    "thematic truth",
    "how Fincher's precise composition style works in practice",
    "storyboards",
    "Carl Franklin",
    "those pressures are real",
    "don't go back"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\n\nBack in March 2025, the Academy Museum opened _Director's Inspiration: Bong Joon-ho_ , which was the first exhibition ever dedicated entirely to the _Parasite_ filmmaker, featuring over 100 original objects from across his career, like storyboards, props, concept art, and creature models.\n\nTo mark the recent April addition of new _Mickey 17_ objects to the show, Director Bong hosted a special 4K screening of _Zodiac_ and got David Fincher to show up for a Q&A.\n\nWhat followed was Director Bong (through a translator) interrogating one of cinema's most exacting directors about why he makes the choices he makes. It’s amazing, a look at what one obsessive filmmaker finds worth asking another.\n\nDirector Bong kept steering toward time, collaboration, the cost of control, and what it means to finish something and let it go. How do you maintain control of something as large and collaborative as a film without losing what made you want to make it in the first place?\n\nFincher's answers focused on stripping the distractions, communicating clearly, knowing when previs serves you and when it doesn't, and letting the thing go when it's done.\n\nLet’s dive into what we can learn.\n\n- YouTube www.youtube.com\n\n## Where Does the Obsession with Clarity Come From?\n\nDirector Bong described Fincher's famously organized office (colored pencils arranged by shade, nothing out of place) and asked whether he found the meticulous director reputation tiresome.\n\nFincher didn't take the bait on the personal mythology. He redirected it to craft.\n\n”I just feel like you should do everything in your power to be as clear in what you're trying to communicate as you can possibly be.”\n\nIf you know anything about Fincher, you know the takes are part of the legend. _Gone Girl_ averaged around 50 takes per scene. Rooney Mara did 99 takes of a single scene in _The Social Network_. On _Mank_ , one dinner party scene ran for an entire week.\n\nAs Fincher told Screen Daily, his logic is simple. You've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars building a set and flying in a crew, so why wouldn't you use it? The takes aren't punishment. They're the point.\n\n“I hate earnestness in performance,” he told The New York Times. “Usually by take 17 the earnestness is gone.”\n\nThe legend of Fincher's perfectionism is less interesting than what lies beneath it. Clarity of communication is the goal. The takes are in service of that. If you want to go deeper into what makes Fincher's filmmaking style tick, we've got you. And if the multi-take approach is something you want to think about for your own work (including when it makes sense and when your budget simply won't allow it), this is worth a read.\n\n## What Is _Zodiac_ Actually About?\n\n_Zodiac_ is a crime thriller set in the Bay Area during the height of the mysterious Zodiac killings. The culprit was never caught.\n\nDirector Bong described _Zodiac_ ’s emotional texture as quiet, lacking the big action sequences of, say, another Fincher movie like _Se7en_. Fincher said that was a deliberate choice.\n\n“We weren't making a movie about a serial killer,” Fincher said. “We were making a movie about the effects of a serial killer on a community and on the lives of people, some of whom probably shouldn't have taken interest.\"\n\nHe added, “This movie is much more about the accretion of hopelessness.”\n\nThe subject of your film, or its plot, and its underlying thematic truth are two different things. When you’re thinking about what your story is really about, you need to be able to point to this—a slasher movie might really be about a familial estrangement, or a political thriller might really be about a search for identity.\n\n_Zodiac_ Credit: Paramount Pictures\n\n## What Are You Actually Fixing When You Adjust the Frame?\n\nThis came up in an anecdote. Director Bong mentioned hearing an actor discuss working with Fincher.\n\nThis actor had done excellent work, but their hands were landing in the wrong place in the frame. The actor told Director Bong that they’d done about 20 takes but finally hit pause, so that Fincher could come over. Instead of giving a note, Fincher just moved a prop slightly.\n\n\"More than half the gig is making sure that there isn't something that's distracting people from what they're supposed to be looking at,” Fincher said. “And so, if you have somebody who is given a hell of a performance, deep, but it happens to look like their hands are coming out of someone's ear, you've got to go, ‘Dude, 18 inches.’”\n\nThe actor was Mark Ruffalo, who appeared in both _Zodiac_ and _Mickey 17_.\n\nAnd Ruffalo, for the record, has always been one of Fincher's more philosophical defenders on the subject of working this way. \"The way I see it is, you enter into someone else's world as an actor,\" he said when the _Zodiac_ takes became a point of public debate (via The New York Times).\n\nDirection is visual problem-solving as much as anything else. And if you want to go deeper on how Fincher's precise composition style works in practice, we've broken it down.\n\n## Do You Storyboard?\n\nDirector Bong storyboards obsessively and seldom deviates. He was curious whether Fincher works the same way.\n\nThe answer was that he used to, until _Panic Room_ showed him the cost. Heavy previz was a production necessity on that film to organize the set, but something unexpected happened to the cast.\n\n\"What ended up happening was the actors kind of wilted,” he said. “They all got sort of, I don't want to say depressed, but there was definitely this feeling of, ‘We're not getting to author where we're going to be in the space.’”\n\nThese are two directors with reputations for total control, but one of them has learned to loosen the grip on blocking.\n\n“I think it got a little stifling,” he said.\n\nFincher says watching other directors work (he names Carl Franklin specifically) shifted how he thought about this. The plan is a starting point. Maybe don’t treat your shot list like scripture.\n\n_Parasite_ Credit: NEON\n\n## Will You Ever Stop Second-Guessing the Film You Made?\n\nDirector Bong asked Fincher to reflect on _Zodiac_ from a 2026 vantage point, nearly 20 years after its release. The answer was more about what it means to make decisions at speed on a production that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a day.\n\n\"You meet so many people in 20 years,\" Fincher said. \"You have an idea about what a characterization should be in order for it to be truthful and read quickly, and you tend to make snap judgments, a lot of pressure. I look at it now, and there's a lot of stuff I'm very happy with, but there's a lot of stuff that I go, ‘Maybe it should be allowed to breathe over here,’ or ‘Maybe it would be should have been weirder,’ you know.”\n\nThis is an acknowledgment that every creative decision is made by a version of you that existed at a specific moment, with specific pressures and specific blind spots.\n\nThe film you make is always a document of who you were when you made it, not who you are now. And those pressures are real. There’s the time, money, the cast and crew waiting on you, and the need to keep going.\n\nThe gap between the film you made and the film you imagined isn't a failure. We’re always learning, and making anything is really hard. You make the call, you move on, and, as Fincher says, you don't go back.",
  "title": "Bong Joon-ho Interrogated David Fincher About His Filmmaking... and It's a Masterclass"
}