{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih46zodpikymlpdvox47agtlnvfj4ifn3dvyfvgk5jb2npsjnihni",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:42p5ujmfj6qapzc4ixx4t4xw/app.bsky.feed.post/3memqoxe4rkh2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreid7ww73rnxwk75opljp7epe7rp5nag4qaaq6ghp3gyvbj7mngjwpu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 7696
  },
  "path": "/p/husserl-on-the-primary-and-secondary",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-11T17:58:42.000Z",
  "site": "https://digressionsimpressions.substack.com",
  "textContent": "Last week’s nitpicky post (here) on Husserl’s treatment of Galileo generated a number of polarized (mostly private) emails: some felt I had been unfair to or misleading on Husserl, while others thought I was not critical enough.",
  "title": "Husserl on Galileo and the Primary and Secondary Quality Distinction"
}