{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig4h7djmt65nifdmvejewt4szbvq54muluunlfmpf2hc6ugctaxae",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:3jg5ch2x6onc5mwonrp5wps6/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhg7u67bdn22"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreielgrcmi6dd26uukjllbacpfso7tnhbwrxjesyqnwkn54hlk652ie"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 129456
  },
  "path": "/stablecoins-just-lost-key-battle-as-insurance-protection-to-be-reserved-only-for-bank-issued-tokens/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-19T14:10:26.000Z",
  "site": "https://cryptoslate.com",
  "tags": [
    "Banking",
    "Featured",
    "Regulation",
    "Stablecoins",
    "Stablecoins just lost key battle as insurance protection to be reserved only for bank-issued tokens",
    "CryptoSlate"
  ],
  "textContent": "The stablecoin debate in Washington is increasingly becoming a fight over a single question: who gets to keep deposit insurance on-chain? FDIC Chair Travis Hill signaled that payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act should not qualify for pass-through insurance, while tokenized deposits that meet the legal definition of a deposit would retain the same insurance […]\n\nThe post Stablecoins just lost key battle as insurance protection to be reserved only for bank-issued tokens appeared first on CryptoSlate.",
  "title": "Stablecoins just lost key battle as insurance protection to be reserved only for bank-issued tokens"
}