{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihz6dhx3vya63eokbiw25surz4oo7d3qsu2mht6hj3ff5efvwalpu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:3jg5ch2x6onc5mwonrp5wps6/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfwuh45lqjl2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiddxbhttshofe4htn6ansnnz3olnmwefqonaczc3ebzxrvsz5bswi"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 231628
  },
  "path": "/supreme-court-tariff-ruling-175b-refund-cash-flow-bitcoin-first-market-tell/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-28T14:50:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://cryptoslate.com",
  "tags": [
    "Analysis",
    "Bear Market",
    "Featured",
    "Legal",
    "Macro",
    "Politics",
    "bitcoin",
    "bitcoin liquidity",
    "BTC",
    "liquidity valve",
    "supreme court",
    "tariff shock",
    "us tariffs",
    "Why Bitcoin traders have to price tariffs like surprise rate hikes while waiting on social media posts for the next $175B trigger",
    "CryptoSlate"
  ],
  "textContent": "The US Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s emergency tariffs under IEEPA on Feb. 20, and markets immediately inherited a large cash flow question. The amount at stake was more than $175 billion in tariff collections that could be subject to refunds, with the Court offering no step-by-step plan for how refunds should be […]\n\nThe post Why Bitcoin traders have to price tariffs like surprise rate hikes while waiting on social media posts for the next $175B trigger appeared first on CryptoSlate.",
  "title": "Why Bitcoin traders have to price tariffs like surprise rate hikes while waiting on social media posts for the next $175B trigger"
}