{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifmy2tig6abtgiwn6pamqdfxw536oequajaishkhot76pc7pnspji",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:3jg5ch2x6onc5mwonrp5wps6/app.bsky.feed.post/3mefwrugdhou2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibjqdilgjnrdeapzkiikbn63hhkhbl2t64n5xcjwrngp2ncqhoonq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 192702
  },
  "path": "/bitcoin-etf-flow-numbers-are-fundamentally-broken-and-most-traders-are-missing-the-specific-sign-of-a-crash/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-08T19:31:59.000Z",
  "site": "https://cryptoslate.com",
  "tags": [
    "Analysis",
    "ETF",
    "In Focus",
    "bitcoin",
    "Blackrock",
    "BTC",
    "etf inflows",
    "GBTC",
    "IBIT",
    "spot bitcoin etfs",
    "Bitcoin ETF flow numbers are fundamentally broken and most traders are missing the specific sign of a crash",
    "CryptoSlate"
  ],
  "textContent": "On Jan.30, 2026, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $509.7 million in net outflows, which looks like pretty straightforward negative sentiment until you look at the individual tickers and realize a few of them stayed green. That contradiction aged fast over the next few days. Feb. 2 snapped back with $561.8 million in net inflows, then […]\n\nThe post Bitcoin ETF flow numbers are fundamentally broken and most traders are missing the specific sign of a crash appeared first on CryptoSlate.",
  "title": "Bitcoin ETF flow numbers are fundamentally broken and most traders are missing the specific sign of a crash"
}