{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihuvfpner2xecvyd7rdwdeb3zmujdbopfjbe27zdst2pna4k2iuym",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:34cg4tn4iwemk3v5k3n3adwf/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlpuktdqxm52"
  },
  "path": "/t/forkgram-and-mercurygram-seem-to-be-missing-the-advertising-anti-feature-tag/34374#post_3",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-13T07:12:16.000Z",
  "site": "https://forum.f-droid.org",
  "tags": [
    "TelegramAndroid/TMessagesProj/src/main/java/org/telegram/ui/bots/BotAdView.java at dev · forkgram/TelegramAndroid · GitHub",
    "this issue"
  ],
  "textContent": "the ads are injected by the telegram developers and are present in the telegram source and consequently in the sources of forkgram and mercurygram. for example, there’s a class for advertising in bots: TelegramAndroid/TMessagesProj/src/main/java/org/telegram/ui/bots/BotAdView.java at dev · forkgram/TelegramAndroid · GitHub\n\nthe developers of forkgram expressed that they are not removing the advertising to stay compliant with telegram’s terms in this issue.\n\nthe ads are added on behalf of the channel/bot owners through the telegram’s advertising network to users who do not have a subscription, not directly by the channels as a regular message.",
  "title": "Forkgram and Mercurygram seem to be missing the advertising anti-feature tag"
}