{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigrgd5ccn3z6uimnpnfgzegvqvbjritsdbayhvjphnz7z2dvdqbx4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpadrvpgzfv2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreietpwdki7hx2ws2f2gqzzrcllpk5mr6ygbjivoyqmcasdilpqmqbi"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 154157
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-01924-8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-27T01:49:31.362Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01924-8"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 26 June 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01924-8\n\nMandatory reviews by top health officials and checks for 235 disfavoured terms have left hundreds of vetted grant applications in administrative limbo.",
  "title": "Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-26T00:00:00.000Z"
}