{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifjomsnzoqdibj2rhabnyrpvq6kbjx6t4kudkkqvjar6nb2kgxpbq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnu6optwdo42"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifcbjuraq3lu6d6oq7gz4enjue26qfydcjldvmvfccbytj32nk2mi"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 59018
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-01815-y",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-09T12:21:07.376Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01815-y"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 09 June 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01815-y\n\nScientists with disparate expertise writing grants together can identify knowledge gaps and drive progress — but systems must change to incentivize them.",
  "title": "Don’t compete, collaborate: why collective funding applications are the future",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z"
}