{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihxrkba7tawdokzmufuzprpoqgavbbs3w4xz7igyue3e2cqznamam",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm75ardjwgp2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidmp6tqtmblgvydktqz4lrbxc3i5aqkf4jp3g2vvfn4425cpzqpty"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 155297
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-01557-x",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-19T10:04:19.329Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01557-x"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 19 May 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01557-x\n\nArtificial intelligence is rapidly accelerating scientific output, but risks narrowing inquiry, weakening judgement and undermining how scientists are trained.",
  "title": "The uncritical adoption of AI in science is alarming — we urgently need guard rails",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z"
}