{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifr77mgndwnr7bkogwf72d7qii2kbezojb6nhgpy2apftdhkxo5de",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkaarcztn7t2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiapagnzhoqtkbkbhaiknolc5ji7qsqnnkv5e6z4iasdhifit4ru2a"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 88708
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-01277-2",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-24T09:49:32.487Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01277-2"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 24 April 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01277-2\n\nSeveral other lists have been launched in the past year, but some scholars want research evaluation to take new forms.",
  "title": "Closure of China’s influential journal ranking leaves academics reeling — what will take its place?",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z"
}