{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigmejd2m2jmzizzpuuw2f7iuscmrlzlhfmu3z5qjjxwlqucxrla3m",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgy2ykndjr42"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiawit2rnyllgdfpawouajqizcerla66gmgd2o7plt3eyuthpzuorm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 248621
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-00743-1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-13T23:29:20.132Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00743-1"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 13 March 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00743-1\n\nThe government’s plans to poach 100 US researchers might make good economic sense. But what about the existing community?",
  "title": "The problem with Canada’s plan to buy scientific prestige",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-13T00:00:00.000Z"
}