{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig2q5m6sspgwmctggcqe3fjgmtfqs6ljkueapxan7jsz4hzfx4ieq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:2gbt2dlwaqovtnmxkat3tyke/app.bsky.feed.post/3mf2ggnqukop2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiec3fweihrglnfyzjncb5xxeg5y3ghf2nd2djeluzff4npnb44lpa"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 174088
  },
  "path": "/articles/d41586-026-00474-3",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-17T11:09:00.544Z",
  "site": "https://www.nature.com",
  "tags": [
    "doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00474-3"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nature, Published online: 17 February 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00474-3\n\nTo ensure that AI advances benefit everyone, scientific institutions must prioritize collaborative, mission-driven structures instead of chasing top talent with astronomical compensation.",
  "title": "Why sky-high pay for AI researchers is bad for the future of science",
  "updatedAt": "2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z"
}